Measuring the sensitivity of tactile temporal order judgments in sighted and blind participants using the adaptive psi method

被引:0
作者
Camille Vanderclausen
Lieve Filbrich
Anne De Volder
Valéry Legrain
机构
[1] Université catholique de Louvain,Institute of Neuroscience
[2] Université catholique de Louvain,Psychological Sciences Research Institute
[3] Université catholique de Louvain,Louvain Bionics
来源
Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics | 2021年 / 83卷
关键词
Temporal order judgment; Adaptive ; method; Spatial representation; Early blindness; Touch;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Spatial locations of somatosensory stimuli are coded according to somatotopic (anatomical distribution of the sensory receptors on the skin surface) and spatiotopic (position of the body parts in external space) reference frames. This was mostly evidenced by means of temporal order judgment (TOJ) tasks in which participants discriminate the temporal order of two tactile stimuli, one applied on each hand. Because crossing the hands generates a conflict between anatomical and spatial responses, TOJ performance is decreased in such posture, except for congenitally blind people, suggesting a role of visual experience in somatosensory perception. In previous TOJ studies, stimuli were generally presented using the method of constant stimuli—that is, the repetition of a predefined sample of stimulus-onset asynchronies (SOA) separating the two stimuli. This method has the disadvantage that a large number of trials is needed to obtain reliable data when aiming at dissociating performances of groups characterized by different cognitive abilities. Indeed, each SOA among a large variety of different SOAs should be presented the same number of times irrespective of the participant’s performance. This study aimed to replicate previous tactile TOJ data in sighted and blind participants with the adaptive psi method in order to validate a novel method that adapts the presented SOA according to the participant’s performance. This allows to precisely estimate the temporal sensitivity of each participant while the presented stimuli are adapted to the participant’s individual discrimination threshold. We successfully replicated previous findings in both sighted and blind participants, corroborating previous data using a more suitable psychophysical tool.
引用
收藏
页码:2995 / 3007
页数:12
相关论文
共 134 条
[1]  
Alary F(2008)Tactile acuity in the blind: A psychophysical study using a two-dimensional angle discrimination task Experimental Brain Research 187 587-594
[2]  
Goldstein R(2008)Changing reference frames during the encoding of tactile events Current Biology 18 1044-1049
[3]  
Duquette M(2015)Human infants’ ability to perceive touch in external space develops postnatally Current Biology 25 R978-R979
[4]  
Chapman CE(2008)Infants lost in (peripersonal) space? Trends in Cognitive Sciences 12 298-305
[5]  
Voss P(2008)Spatial localization of touch in the first year of life: early influence of a visual spatial code and the development of remapping across changes in limb position Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 137 149-162
[6]  
Lepore F(2010)Crossing the hands is more confusing for females than males Experimental Brain Research 204 431-446
[7]  
Azañon E(2005)Confidence intervals in within-subject designs: A simpler solution to Loftus and Masson's method Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology 1 42-45
[8]  
Soto-Faraco S(2017)How visual experience impacts the internal and external spatial mapping of sensorimotor functions Scientific Reports 7 1022-262
[9]  
Begum Ali J(1998)Attention and the crossmodal construction of space Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2 254-2079
[10]  
Spence C(2017)Orienting attention in visual space by nociceptive stimuli: Investigation with a temporal order judgment task based on the adaptive PSI method Experimental Brain Research 235 2069-115