Valuation in the Lab

被引：0
作者：
Jason F. Shogren
机构：
[1] University of Wyoming,Department of Economics and Finance
来源：
Environmental and Resource Economics | 2006年 / 34卷
关键词：
valuation; experiments; hypothetical bias; rational choice;
D O I：
暂无
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
Experimental methods have proven useful to explore the power and limits to nonmarket valuation through stated preference methods. We now understand better how people learn about and react to the incentives, institutions, and information created by surveys. This paper briefly reviews topics in experimental valuation, including ex ante bias corrections, ex post bias calibration, and examining the circumstances that strengthen or weaken the economist’s presumption of rational valuation.
引用
收藏
页码：163 / 172
页数：9
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]  
Allais M.(1953)‘Le comportement de l’homme rationnel devant le risque: Critique des postulats et axiomes de ’ecole Americaine’ Econometrica 21 503-546
[2]  
Bennett J.(1983)‘Validating revealed preferences’ Economic Analysis and Policy 13 2-17
[3]  
Bohm P.(1972)‘Estimating demand for public goods: An experiment’ European Economic Review 3 111-130
[4]  
Cherry T.(2003)‘Rationality spillovers’ Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 45 63-84
[5]  
Crocker T.(1986)‘The application of laboratory experimental economics to the contingent valuation of public goods’ Public Choice 49 47-68
[6]  
Shogren J.(1999)‘Unbiased value estimates for environmental goods: A cheap talk design for the contingent valuation method’ American Economic Review 83 649-665
[7]  
Coursey D.(2000)‘Efficient auctions’ Quarterly Journal of Economics 115 341-388
[8]  
Schulze W.(1961)‘Risk, ambiguity, and the Savage axioms’ Quarterly Journal of Economics 75 643-669
[9]  
Cummings R.(2004)‘Experimental methods and elicitation of values’ Experimental Economics 7 123-140
[10]  
Taylor L.(2004)‘Field experiments’ Journal of Economic Literature 42 1013-1059
12345