Adapting conservation to climate change: a case study on feasibility and implementation in Brandenburg, Germany

被引:0
作者
Juliane Geyer
Lena Strixner
Stefan Kreft
Florian Jeltsch
Pierre L. Ibisch
机构
[1] Eberswalde University for Sustainable Development,Centre for Econics and Ecosystem Management, Faculty of Forest and Environment
[2] University of Potsdam,Institute of Biochemistry and Biology, Plant Ecology and Nature Conservation
[3] ZALF,undefined
[4] Leibniz-Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research,undefined
[5] Berlin-Brandenburg Institute of Advanced Biodiversity Research (BBIB),undefined
来源
Regional Environmental Change | 2015年 / 15卷
关键词
Climate change; Adaptation options; Nature conservation management; Vulnerability;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Conservation actions need to account for global climate change and adapt to it. The body of the literature on adaptation options is growing rapidly, but their feasibility and current state of implementation are rarely assessed. We discussed the practicability of adaptation options with conservation managers analysing three fields of action: reducing the vulnerability of conservation management, reducing the vulnerability of conservation targets (i.e. biodiversity) and climate change mitigation. For all options, feasibility, current state of implementation and existing obstacles to implementation were analysed, using the Federal State of Brandenburg, Germany, as a case study. Practitioners considered a large number of options useful, most of which have already been implemented at least in part. Those options considered broadly implemented resemble mainly conventional measures of conservation without direct relation to climate change. Managers are facing several obstacles for adapting to climate change, including political reluctance to change, financial and staff shortages in conservation administrations and conflictive EU funding schemes in agriculture. A certain reluctance to act, due to the high degree of uncertainty with regard to climate change scenarios and impacts, is widespread. A lack of knowledge of appropriate methods such as adaptive management often inhibits the implementation of adaptation options in the field of planning and management. Based on the findings for Brandenburg, we generally conclude that it is necessary to focus in particular on options that help to reduce vulnerability of conservation management itself, i.e. those that enhance management effectiveness. For instance, adaptive and proactive risk management can be applied as a no-regrets option, independently from specific climate change scenarios or impacts, strengthening action under uncertainty.
引用
收藏
页码:139 / 153
页数:14
相关论文
共 199 条
[1]  
Arlettaz R(2010)From publications to public actions: when conservation biologists bridge the gap between research and implementation Bioscience 60 835-842
[2]  
Schaub M(2011)The implementation crisis in conservation planning: could “mental models” help? Conserv Lett 4 169-183
[3]  
Fournier J(2007)Climate change and biodiversity: impacts and policy development challenges—a European case study Int J Biodivers Sci Manag 3 12-30
[4]  
Reichlin TS(2012)Accelerating adaptation of natural resource management to address climate change Conserv Biol 27 4-13
[5]  
Sierro A(2011)Does proactive biodiversity conservation save costs? Biodivers Conserv 20 1045-1055
[6]  
Watson JEM(2009)Stuck in the clouds: bringing the CBD’s ecosystem approach for conservation management down to Earth in Canada and Germany J Nat Conserv 17 212-227
[7]  
Braunisch V(2012)A global map of the functionality of terrestrial ecosystems Ecol Complex 12 13-22
[8]  
Biggs D(2006)Climate change vulnerability assessments: an evolution of conceptual thinking Clim Chang 75 301-329
[9]  
Abel N(2009)Regional climate change adaptation strategies for biodiversity conservation in a midcontinental region of North America Biol Conserv 142 2012-2022
[10]  
Knight AT(2006)Linkages between vulnerability, resilience, and adaptive capacity Glob Environ Chang 16 293-303