Partial Ownership for Outer Space Resources

被引:0
|
作者
Beauvois E. [1 ]
Thirion G. [2 ]
机构
[1] International Master SEEDS, Politecnico Di Torino, Torino
[2] International Master SEEDS, ISAE-Supaéro, Toulouse
关键词
Economics; Ethics; Governance; Law; Partial ownership; Space mining;
D O I
10.1007/s42423-019-00042-0
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The most widely adopted agreement on space law, the Outer Space Treaty (OST) (1967), actively promotes international partnerships and peaceful uses of outer space. It also forbids any claims of sovereignty or private property on celestial bodies; however, nothing is explicitly written about the use of resources that can be found there. Other texts, like the Moon Agreement (1979), attempted to extend provisions on this regard, but only 18 nations ratified this agreement, probably because it also contains obligations that remove all incentives for the private industry to participate in the exploitation of outer space resources, such as the obligation to disclose all discoveries and share the benefits between all state parties. Today, most missions are scientific, so there is no need to compete for using space resources. If tomorrow society wants to incentivize participation, and leverage the available funds, from the private sector to explore and exploit outer space, an allocation mechanism that allows to dispute the use of resources needs to be set up. On Earth, this is achieved by the private property system and commercial competition. However, private property is not allowed by the OST, because it has a right of exclusion, and everyone shall be free to use space resources if it does not interfere with activities of other nations. An exclusivity of use for the first nation to exploit a given resource is not desired either and is precisely why the OST was established in the first place. In full compliance with the OST, this paper introduces the concept of Partial Ownership of Outer Space Resources (POOSR). This system allows to compete for the use of resources, without granting monopoly, as it always keeps the competition for ownership open. It is based on the introduction of a Harberger tax and a Partial Ownership system, that allows to expose commonly-owned resources (such as outer space asteroids, or planetary surface areas) to the efficiency of allocation provided by market dynamics, while preserving the incentives for investment to the current owners and preventing resource locking. This paper shows how such system would foster investments from private entities, as well as how it would benefit to all the international entities or nations participating to it. The synergy between such system, international regulations, and national laws, to establish a regulation for space mining and other outer space activities is also discussed. © 2020, The Author(s).
引用
收藏
页码:29 / 36
页数:7
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [41] Strengthening Urban Resilience: Understanding the Interdependencies of Outer Space and Strategic Planning for Sustainable Smart Environments
    Botezatu, Ulpia-Elena
    Bucovetchi, Olga
    Gheorghe, Adrian V.
    Stanciu, Radu D.
    SMART CITIES, 2023, 6 (05): : 2499 - 2518
  • [42] Institutional environment, political connections of partial state ownership, and performance An empirical study on listed private sector firms in China
    Song, Zengji
    Nahm, Abraham
    Yang, Jun
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL ECONOMICS, 2016, 43 (08) : 856 - 870
  • [43] ON THE PRACTICES OF RISK RE-NORMALISATION: 'KNOWING' THE KNOWN UNKNOWNS IN PUBLIC DISCOURSE ON OUTER SPACE EXPLORATION
    Vidmar, Matjaz
    TEORIJA IN PRAKSA, 2019, 56 (03): : 814 - 835
  • [44] The American Space Commerce Free Enterprise Act of 2017: The Latest Step in Regulating the Space Resources Utilization Industry or Something More?
    Hao, Liu
    Tronchetti, Fabio
    SPACE POLICY, 2019, 47 : 1 - 6
  • [45] CONFERENCE DIPLOMACY AS THE MACHINERY FOR MANUFACTURING CONSENT: PAX AMERICANA AND THE CASE OF OUTER SPACE TREATY AND THE WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION
    Saunders, Melanie K.
    MELBOURNE JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW, 2021, 22 (01)
  • [46] A partial-budgeting tool to describe the effect of lactation space and lactation-space management on net revenue in a multi-site production system
    Main, RG
    Dritz, SS
    Tokach, MD
    Goodband, RD
    Dhuyvetter, KC
    Nelssen, JL
    JOURNAL OF SWINE HEALTH AND PRODUCTION, 2005, 13 (06): : 322 - 332
  • [47] Scalar politics and strategic consolidation: The Norwegian Gas Forum's quest for embedding Norwegian gas resources in domestic space
    Underthun, Anders
    Kasa, Sjur
    Reitan, Marit
    NORSK GEOGRAFISK TIDSSKRIFT-NORWEGIAN JOURNAL OF GEOGRAPHY, 2011, 65 (04) : 226 - 237
  • [48] Interrelationships between Public Open Space, Common Pool Resources, Publicness Levels and Commons Dilemmas: A Different Perspective in Urban Planning
    Ling, Gabriel Hoh Teck
    Ho, Chin Siong
    Tsau, Kar Yen
    Cheng, Chin Tiong
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BUILT ENVIRONMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 6 (02): : 13 - 21
  • [49] Should the Red Dragon arise? Assessing China's options vis-a-vis the enactment of a domestic space resources utilization law
    Hao, Liu
    Tronchetti, Fabio
    SPACE POLICY, 2017, 39-40 : 9 - 13