The relation between the quality of research, researchers’ experience, and their academic environment

被引:0
作者
Thor-Erik Sandberg Hanssen
Finn Jørgensen
Berner Larsen
机构
[1] Nord University,Business School
来源
Scientometrics | 2018年 / 114卷
关键词
Research; Research quality; Citations; Department size; Experience;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This article investigates to what extent researchers’ experience and the solidity of their academic environment influence the quality of their research. The hypotheses are derived from the assumptions that experience matters for quality research and that there are great intellectual synergies to be obtained from interacting with many colleagues who are active researchers. All articles published between 2000 and 2006 in five leading transportation journals are included in the analysis, and their research quality is measured by the number of times each article is cited by August 2016. Controlling for other factors influencing citations, such as article age and the number of references, the most important finding is that both experience and academic environment matter for performing quality research. When the authors’ experience, measured by the number of previous publications, increases by 1% from its average level, their published articles are expected to garner 0.31% more citations. Moreover, when the research activity at the unit to which the authors are affiliated, measured by the unit’s total number of publications, increases by 1% from its average level, the number of times their articles are cited will increase by 0.19%. This signals that, relatively speaking, the researchers’ own experience and merits mean more than the academic environment with regard to producing high-quality research. The above results enable us to discuss how researchers’ experience can compensate for working in less active academic communities holding research quality constant.
引用
收藏
页码:933 / 950
页数:17
相关论文
共 93 条
  • [1] Abramo G(2015)The relationship between the number of authors of a publication, its citations and the impact factor of the publishing journal: Evidence from Italy Journal of Informetrics 9 746-761
  • [2] D’Angelo CA(2003)Characteristics of highly cited papers Research Evaluation 12 159-170
  • [3] Aksnes DW(2004)Does collaborative research have greater epistemic authority? Scientometrics 60 399-408
  • [4] Beaver DD(2006)Some predictors of SMJ article impact Strategic Management Journal 27 81-100
  • [5] Bergh DD(2015)Bibliometric evaluation vs. informed peer review: Evidence from Italy Research Policy 44 451-466
  • [6] Perry J(2003)Age effects in scientific productivity: The case of the Italian National Research Council (CNR) Scientometrics 58 49-90
  • [7] Hanke R(2008)What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior Journal of Documentation 64 45-80
  • [8] Bertocchi G(1986)What is a citation worth? The Journal of Human Resources 21 200-215
  • [9] Gambardella A(2013)Determinants of research citation impact in nanoscience and nanotechnology Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 64 1055-1064
  • [10] Jappelli T(2015)How to become an important player in scientific collaboration networks? Journal of Informetrics 9 809-825