Berufliches Handeln in Dilemmasituationen - Führungskräfte zwischen Pflichterfüllung und Eigenverantwortung

被引:0
作者
Kaschube J. [1 ]
Gasteiger R.M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Organisations- und Wirtschaftspsychologie, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, 80802 München
来源
Gruppendynamik und Organisationsberatung | 2005年 / 36卷 / 2期
关键词
D O I
10.1007/s11612-005-0123-0
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Taking decisions and acting in non-standard situations - which are not described in company guidelines and procedures - is part of a manager's role and responsibilities. As part of an empirical study 158 managers as well as potential management candidates have been put into dilemma situations in which they have to choose between strictly following company policies or alternatively taking own initiative and choosing a self-responsible action path with more risks and conflict potential. To explain the decisions taken different background information is used such as the organizational culture, the manager's personal goals and a scale describing self-responsibility as a part of the individual's self-concept. The preference of organizations is described in relation to the organization's culture: Following guidelines and 'doing one's duty' was the most favored solution from the organization's point of view. Managers and management candidates choose self-responsible acting with low conflict potential when they feel in harmony with their organization. Managers only choose self-responsible acting with high conflict potential if they have a strong tendency for taking own initiative and are ready to take responsibility for their actions. The results are discussed focusing on self-responsibility levels and on consequences for organizations.
引用
收藏
页码:191 / 206
页数:15
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [21] Organ D.W., Paine J.B., A new kind of performance for Industrial and Organizational psychology: Recent contributions to the study of organizational citizenship behavior, International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 14, pp. 337-368, (1999)
  • [22] Preisendorfer P., Verantwortung im Betrieb: Eine Theoretische und Empirische Analyse des Verantwortungskonzeptes Sowie von Problemen der Verantwortung in Betrieblichen Kontexten, (1985)
  • [23] Remer A., Wygoda S., Eigenverantwortung als Ziel der Organisationsgestaltung, Eigenverantwortung für Organisationen, pp. 91-106, (2003)
  • [24] Robbins T.L., Crino M.D., Fredendall L.D., An integrative model of the empowerment process, Human Ressource Management Review, 12, pp. 419-443, (2002)
  • [25] Schein E.H., Occupational socialization in the professions: The case of role innovation, Journal of Psychiatric Research, 8, pp. 521-530, (1971)
  • [26] Schlenker B.R., Personal responsibility. Applications of the triangle model, Research in Organizational Behavior, 19, pp. 241-301, (1997)
  • [27] Staw B.M., Boettger R.D., Task revision: A neglected form of work performance, Academy of Management Journal, 33, pp. 534-559, (1990)
  • [28] Van Dyne L., Cummings L.L., McLean-Parks J., Extra-role behaviors: In pursuit of contruct and definitional clarity (a bridge over muddied waters), Research in Organizational Behavior, 17, pp. 215-285, (1995)
  • [29] Wrzesniewski A., Dutton J.E., Crafting a job: Revisioning employees as active crafters of their work, Academy of Management Review, 26, 2, pp. 179-201, (2001)
  • [30] Wunderer R., Mitarbeiter als Mitunternehmer - Ein Transformationskonzept, Mitarbeiter als Mitunternehmer. Grundlagen, Förderinstrumente, Praxisbeispiele, pp. 23-46, (1999)