Berufliches Handeln in Dilemmasituationen - Führungskräfte zwischen Pflichterfüllung und Eigenverantwortung

被引:0
作者
Kaschube J. [1 ]
Gasteiger R.M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Organisations- und Wirtschaftspsychologie, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, 80802 München
来源
Gruppendynamik und Organisationsberatung | 2005年 / 36卷 / 2期
关键词
D O I
10.1007/s11612-005-0123-0
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Taking decisions and acting in non-standard situations - which are not described in company guidelines and procedures - is part of a manager's role and responsibilities. As part of an empirical study 158 managers as well as potential management candidates have been put into dilemma situations in which they have to choose between strictly following company policies or alternatively taking own initiative and choosing a self-responsible action path with more risks and conflict potential. To explain the decisions taken different background information is used such as the organizational culture, the manager's personal goals and a scale describing self-responsibility as a part of the individual's self-concept. The preference of organizations is described in relation to the organization's culture: Following guidelines and 'doing one's duty' was the most favored solution from the organization's point of view. Managers and management candidates choose self-responsible acting with low conflict potential when they feel in harmony with their organization. Managers only choose self-responsible acting with high conflict potential if they have a strong tendency for taking own initiative and are ready to take responsibility for their actions. The results are discussed focusing on self-responsibility levels and on consequences for organizations.
引用
收藏
页码:191 / 206
页数:15
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] Abetti P.A., The birth and growth of Toshiba's laptop and notebook computers: A case study in Japanese corporate venturing, Journal of Business Venturing, 12, pp. 507-529, (1997)
  • [2] Borman W.C., Motowidlo S.J., Task performance and contextual performance: The meaning for personnel selection research, Human Performance, 10, 2, pp. 99-109, (1997)
  • [3] Conway J.M., Distinguishing contextual performance from task performance for managerial jobs, Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 1, pp. 3-13, (1999)
  • [4] Crant J.M., Proactive behavior in organizations, Journal of Management, 26, 3, pp. 435-462, (2000)
  • [5] Dulewicz V., Herbert P., Predicting advancement to senior management from competencies and personality data: A seven-year follow-up study, British Journal of Management, 10, pp. 13-22, (1999)
  • [6] Faust M., Jauch P., Notz P., Befreit und Entwurzelt: Führungskräfte auf dem Weg zum "Internen Unternehmer", (2000)
  • [7] Frese M., Fay D., Personal initiative: An active performance concept for work in the 21st century, Research in Organizational Behavior, 23, pp. 133-187, (2001)
  • [8] Hisrich R.D., Entrepreneurship/intrapreneurship, American Psychologist, 45, pp. 209-222, (1990)
  • [9] Kaschube J., Eigenverantwortung - Eine neue Berufliche Leistung, (2005)
  • [10] Kaschube J., Lang-Von Wins T., Unternehmerisches Handeln bei Führungsnachwuchskräften - Anmerkung zur Perspektive westdeutscher Personalverantwortlicher, Existenzgründung und Unternehmertum, pp. 284-296, (1999)