Process Evaluation of a Participatory Supportive Return to Work Program for Workers Without a Permanent Employment Contract, Sick-Listed Due to a Common Mental Disorder

被引:0
作者
Lieke Lammerts
Frederieke G. Schaafsma
Willem van Mechelen
Johannes R. Anema
机构
[1] VU University Medical Center,Department of Public and Occupational Health, EMGO + Institute for Health and Care Research
[2] AMC-UMCG-UWV-VUmc,Research Centre for Insurance Medicine
来源
Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation | 2017年 / 27卷
关键词
Process evaluation; Return to work; Occupational health care; Worker without employment contract; Randomized controlled trial;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose This study aimed to perform a process evaluation of a participatory supportive return to work program for workers without a (permanent) employment contract, sick-listed due to a common mental disorder. The program consisted of a participatory approach, integrated care and direct placement in a competitive job. Our main questions were: were these components realized in practice and in accordance with the protocol? The evaluation took place alongside a randomized controlled trial. Methods The study population consisted of workers who filed a sickness benefit claim at the Dutch Social Security Agency, professionals of this agency and of vocational rehabilitation agencies. We focused on sick-listed workers and professionals who had actually participated in the intervention. Data was collected mainly by questionnaires. Results Only 36 out of 94 intervention group participants started with the program. In half of these cases application of integrated care was reported. Most other steps in the program were completed. However, fidelity to the protocol was low to reasonable. Much delay was observed in the execution of the program and only two sick-listed workers were placed in a competitive job. Still, satisfaction with the participatory approach was good. Conclusions Despite the positive evaluation of the participatory approach, the full program was executed less successfully compared to similar programs evaluated in earlier studies. This will probably affect the outcomes of our trial. Findings from this study will help to interpret these outcomes. Nevertheless, more knowledge is needed about experiences of stakeholders who participated in the program. Trial Registration NTR3563.
引用
收藏
页码:159 / 172
页数:13
相关论文
共 67 条
[1]  
Lammerts L(2014)Return to work of workers without a permanent employment contract, sick-listed due to a common mental disorder: design of a randomised controlled trial BMC Public Health 14 594-416
[2]  
Vermeulen SJ(2006)Process evaluation in randomised controlled trials of complex interventions BMJ 332 413-S60
[3]  
Schaafsma FG(2004)What drives change? Barriers to and incentives for achieving evidence-based practice Med J Aust 180 S57-622
[4]  
Van Mechelen W(2001)The intervention research process in occupational safety and health: an overview from the National Occupational Research Agenda Intervention Effectiveness Research team J Occup Environ Med 43 616-281
[5]  
Anema JR(2003)Participatory ergonomics as a return-to-work intervention: a future challenge? Am J Ind Med 44 273-140
[6]  
Oakley A(2009)An integrated care program to prevent work disability due to chronic low back pain: a process evaluation within a randomized controlled trial BMC Musculoskelet Disord 10 147-222
[7]  
Strange V(2012)A participatory return-to-work program for temporary agency workers and unemployed workers sick-listed due to musculoskeletal disorders: a process evaluation alongside a randomized controlled trial J Occup Rehabil 22 127-602
[8]  
Bonell C(2009)A participatory workplace intervention for employees with distress and lost time: a feasibility evaluation within a randomized controlled trial J Occup Rehabil 19 212-324
[9]  
Allen E(2010)A workplace intervention for sick-listed employees with distress: results of a randomised controlled trial Occup Environ Med 67 596-123
[10]  
Stephenson J(2011)A participatory return-to-work intervention for temporary agency workers and unemployed workers sick-listed due to musculoskeletal disorders: results of a randomized controlled trial J Occup Rehabil 21 313-52