Agricultural GMOs and their associated pesticides: misinformation, science, and evidence

被引:0
作者
Michael N. Antoniou
Claire Robinson
Irina Castro
Angelika Hilbeck
机构
[1] Guy’s Hospital,Gene Expression and Therapy Group, King’s College London, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, Department of Medical and Molecular Genetics
[2] GMWatch,Centre for Social Studies
[3] University of Coimbra,undefined
[4] Colégio de S. Jerónimo,undefined
[5] Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH) Zurich,undefined
来源
Environmental Sciences Europe | / 35卷
关键词
Biotechnology; Agricultural biotechnology; Genetic engineering; Genetic modification; Genetically modified organism; GMO; Pesticides; Glyphosate; Media analysis; Media coverage; Misinformation; COVID-19; Climate change;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Misinformation has always existed, but it became a major preoccupation during the COVID-19 pandemic due to its ability to affect public health choices, decisions, and policy. In their article, “Misinformation in the media: Global coverage of GMOs 2019–2021” (GM Crops & Food, 17 Nov 2022), Mark Lynas et al. characterise critics of agricultural genetically modified organisms (GMOs) and their associated pesticides as purveyors of “misinformation”. They draw an equivalence between critics of agricultural GMOs and people who make false claims about climate change, COVID-19, and vaccines. We examined their main claims on these GMOs—for example, that there is a scientific consensus that they are safe for health and the environment—in the light of the scientific evidence and public discussion on this topic. We found that their claims are biased and misleading and ignore or omit crucial evidence. We conclude that based on the evidence provided, Lynas et al. article can itself be classed as misinformation and could therefore mislead the general public as well as the scientific community.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 342 条
  • [1] Lynas M(2022)Misinformation in the media: global coverage of GMOs 2019–2021 GM Crops & Food 118 e1912444117-451
  • [2] Adams J(2021)Misinformation in and about science Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 41 433-7661
  • [3] Conrow J(2020)Public health and online misinformation: challenges and recommendations Annu Rev Publ Health 116 7656-220
  • [4] West JD(2019)Scientific communication in a post-truth society Proc Natl Acad Sci 9 211-304
  • [5] Bergstrom CT(2016)Science communication and the issue of trust JCOM 1 281-245
  • [6] Swire-Thompson B(2006)Public engagement as a means of restoring public trust in science—hitting the notes, but missing the music? Commun Genet 15 241-114
  • [7] Lazer D(1992)Misunderstood misunderstanding: social identities and public uptake of science Publ Underst Sci 19 98-180
  • [8] Iyengar S(2004)Science policy and society: The British debate over GM agriculture Curr Opin Biotechnol 8 169-477
  • [9] Massey DS(2010)Genetically modified food in the news: media representations of the GM debate in the UK Public Underst Sci 50 459-32
  • [10] Weingart P(1999)How the public understands genetics: non-deterministic and non-discriminatory interpretations of the “blueprint” metaphor Public Underst Sci 7 e1002199-175