Low doses of GM-CSF (molgramostim) and G-CSF (filgrastim) after cyclophosphamide (4 g/m2) enhance the peripheral blood progenitor cell harvest: results of two randomized studies including 120 patients

被引:0
作者
P Quittet
P Ceballos
E Lopez
Z Y Lu
P Latry
C Becht
E Legouffe
N Fegueux
C Exbrayat
D Pouessel
V Rouillé
J P Daures
B Klein
J F Rossi
机构
[1] Service Hématologie et Oncologie médicale,
[2] Hopital Lapeyronie,undefined
[3] Unité de Thérapie Cellulaire,undefined
[4] Hopital St-Eloi,undefined
[5] Unité de Biostatistiques,undefined
[6] IURC,undefined
[7] INSERM U475,undefined
来源
Bone Marrow Transplantation | 2006年 / 38卷
关键词
G-CSF; GM-CSF; hematopoietic stem cells;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The use of a combination of G-CSF and GM-CSF versus G-CSF alone, after cyclophosphamide (4 g/m2) was compared in two randomized phase III studies, including 120 patients. In study A, 60 patients received 5 × 2 μg/kg/day of G-CSF and GM-CSF compared to 5 μg/kg/day of G-CSF. In study B, 60 patients received 2.5 × 2 μg/kg/day G-CSF and GM-CSF compared to G-CSF alone (5 μg/kg/day). With the aim to collect at least 5 × 106/kg CD34 cells in a maximum of three large volume leukapherises (LK), 123 LK were performed in study A, showing a significantly higher number of patients reaching 10 × 106/kg CD34 cells (21/29 in G+GM-CSF arm vs 11/27 in G-CSF arm, P=0.00006). In study B, 109 LK were performed, with similar results (10/27 vs 15/26, P=0.003). In both the study, the total harvest of CD34 cells/kg was twofold higher in G-CSF plus GM-CSF group (18.3 × 106 in study A and 15.85 × 106 in study B) than in G-CSF group (9 × 106 in study A and 8.1 × 106 in study B), a significant difference only seen in multiple myeloma, with no significant difference in terms of mobilized myeloma cells between G-CSF and GM-CSF groups.
引用
收藏
页码:275 / 284
页数:9
相关论文
共 273 条
[1]  
Attal M(1996)A prospective, randomized trial of autologous bone marrow transplantation and chemotherapy in multiple myeloma N Engl J Med 335 91-97
[2]  
Harousseau JL(2005)Stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma (0, 1, or 2) Curr Opin Oncol 17 93-98
[3]  
Stoppa AM(2004)Autologous stem cell transplantation in hematological malignancies Springer Semin Immunopathol 26 3-30
[4]  
Sotto JJ(1995)Autologous bone marrow transplantation as compared with salvage chemotherapy in relapses of chemotherapy-sensitive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma N Engl J Med 333 1540-1545
[5]  
Fuzibet JG(2004)Accreditation Committee of the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in Europe 2002. Changes in indication and impact of team density. A report of the EBMT activity survey Bone Marrow Transplant 34 855-875
[6]  
Rossi JF(1996)Optimization of stem cell mobilization Stem Cells 14 106-116
[7]  
Harousseau JL(1995)Harvesting and enrichment of HPC mobilized into the peripheral blood of normal donors by GM-CSF or G-CSF: potential role in allogenic transplantation Blood 85 275-282
[8]  
Gorin NC(1993)Comparative effect of GM-CSF and G-CSF on priming of peripheral blood progenitor cells for use with autologous bone marrow after high dose chemotherapy Blood 81 1709-1719
[9]  
Philip T(2002)Comparison between granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor in the mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells Curr Opin Hematol 9 190-198
[10]  
Guglielmi C(1998)Biologic effects and potential clinical applications of Flt3 ligand Curr Opin Hematol 5 192-196