Stock liquidity on China NEEQ exchange

被引:9
作者
Liu N. [1 ]
Xu W. [1 ]
机构
[1] HSBC Business School, Peking University, University Town, Nanshan District, Shenzhen
关键词
Exchange; Information asymmetry; Liquidity; Market making; NEEQ;
D O I
10.1007/s40822-016-0057-6
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
With the recent deregulation, the National Equities Exchange and Quotations (NEEQ) has become the fastest growing exchange in China. Despite its phenomenal growth, the NEEQ has an urgent need to improve its liquidity, as 70 % of the stocks listed are never traded and more than half of the stocks have an average daily price swing over 10 %. We study factors that affect the liquidity of the NEEQ-listed firms and provide evidence that large information asymmetry decreases liquidity on the NEEQ. Specifically, we find that informed ownership and concentrated ownership both have significantly negative influence on a stock’s liquidity, while institutional ownership and leverage have no impact. In addition, market makers do not alleviate the information asymmetry of firms listed on the NEEQ. However their involvement does improve firms’ liquidity by providing more efficient price discovery. We conclude that the information asymmetry in firms contributes to the extreme lacking of liquidity on the NEEQ. To improve their liquidity, firms can adopt more diffused ownership and/or reduce the informed ownership while the exchange needs to improve its institutional settings such as enforcing the market making transaction to all firms and strengthening its information releasing requirement to enforce more frequent information releasing and better releasing quality. © 2016, Eurasia Business and Economics Society.
引用
收藏
页码:255 / 275
页数:20
相关论文
共 39 条
[31]  
Martin P., Analysis of the impact of competitive rates on the liquidity of NYSE stocks, Economic Staff Papers, 75–3, (1975)
[32]  
Merton R., A simple model of capital market equilibrium with incomplete information, Journal of Finance, 42, pp. 483-510, (1987)
[33]  
Morck R., Shleifer A., Vishny W., Management ownership and market valuation, Journal of Financial Economics, 20, pp. 293-315, (1988)
[34]  
Rubin A., Ownership level, ownership concentration and liquidity, Journal of Financial Markets, 10, pp. 219-248, (2007)
[35]  
Sarin A., Shastri K.A., Shastri K., Ownership structure and stock market liquidity, (2000)
[36]  
Schwartz R., Shapiro J., The challenge of institutionalization of the equity market, Recent developments in Finance, (1992)
[37]  
Taussig R.D., Akron S., Returns to scale, operating leverage, and expected stock returns, Eurasian Business Review, 53, pp. 1-15, (2016)
[38]  
Wu W., Wang X., Cheng G., Information asymmetry and ownership structure: An empirical analysis on Chinese public traded companies, System Engineering Theory and Practice, 11, pp. 28-32, (2004)
[39]  
Xu S., Cheng X., An empirical analysis of the impact of ownership structure on stock liquidity, Academic Forum, 8, pp. 158-164, (2012)