Hip and Knee Arthroplasty in Osteoarthritis

被引:1
作者
Erik C. Zachwieja
Jose Perez
Michaela Schneiderbauer
机构
[1] University of Miami/Jackson Memorial Hospital,Miller School of Medicine
关键词
Osteoarthritis; Arthroplasty; Hip; Knee; Surgical management of osteoarthritis;
D O I
10.1007/s40674-017-0063-1
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Osteoarthritis (OA) of the hip and knee continues to increase in prevalence with the increasing age of our population. This condition is characterized by joint pain, stiffness, and limitations in activities of daily living. Management options are initially aimed at preventing the progression of disease and delaying the need for total joint arthroplasty (TJA). This includes nonoperative measures, as well as surgical interventions, including arthroscopy, osteotomy, and arthrodesis. However, once patients fail alternative therapy, TJA is indicated. Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and total hip arthroplasty (THA) are highly effective procedures at reducing pain and improving functional status. Patients report high satisfaction rates after TJA and experience minimal complications. Moreover, these procedures are cost effective. Significant research into patient-specific implants (PSI) and computer-navigation-assisted surgery shows improved component positioning; however, further research is needed to determine the clinical effect of this innovation. Wear rates in both TKA and THA have improved significantly over the past decade, with highly cross-linked ultra-high molecular-weight polyethylene showing promising results. New minimally invasive surgical techniques are also showing excellent short-term results, but long-term data is still lacking. Overall, hip and knee OA is a debilitating condition that can be effectively managed with TKA or THA. Indications continue to expand for these procedures and innovation continues to aim for improved outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:75 / 87
页数:12
相关论文
共 409 条
[61]  
Giffin JR(2014)Why are total knee arthroplasties failing today—has anything changed after 10 years? J Arthroplast 29 1774-99
[62]  
Willits KR(2016)Causes for revision surgery in total hip replacement. A retrospective epidemiological analysis Rev Esp Cir Ortop Traumatol 60 160-2320
[63]  
Wong CJ(2015)Revision primary total hip replacement: causes and risk factors J Med Assoc Thail 98 93-2563
[64]  
Moseley JB(2010)Failed metal-on-metal hip arthroplasties: a spectrum of clinical presentations and operative findings Clin Orthop Relat Res 468 2313-153
[65]  
O'Malley K(2016)Outcome of revision total hip arthroplasty in management of failed metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty J Arthroplast 31 2559-111
[66]  
Petersen NJ(2006)Total joint replacement in osteoarthritis Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 20 145-2476
[67]  
Menke TJ(2016)Patient-specific instrumentation improved mechanical alignment, while early clinical outcome was comparable to conventional instrumentation in TKA Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 24 102-158
[68]  
Brody BA(2014)No benefit of patient-specific instrumentation in TKA on functional and gait outcomes: a randomized clinical trial Clin Orthop Relat Res 472 2468-2219
[69]  
Kuykendall DH(2015)Systematic review of patient-specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty: new but not improved Clin Orthop Relat Res 473 151-1037
[70]  
Bedard NA(2013)Rotation in total knee arthroplasty: no difference between patient-specific and conventional instrumentation Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21 2213-636