Institutional change and academic patenting: French universities and the Innovation Act of 1999

被引:0
作者
Antonio Della Malva
Francesco Lissoni
Patrick Llerena
机构
[1] Maastricht University,BETA
[2] DIMI-Università di Brescia and KITES-Universitá Bocconi,undefined
[3] Universitè de Strasbourg,undefined
来源
Journal of Evolutionary Economics | 2013年 / 23卷
关键词
Academic inventions; Academic research; Intellectual property; Patents; I23; O31; O34;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The Innovation Act was introduced by the French government in 1999, with the aim of encouraging academic institutions to protect and commercialize their scientists’ inventions. We explore the effects of the Act on the distribution of Intellectual Property Rights (IPRs) over academic scientists’ inventions. We find that, before the Act, academic institutions had a strong tendency to leave such IPRs in the hands of their main funders, namely public research organizations (such as CNRS or INSERM), and business companies. After the introduction of the Act, French academic institutions increased their propensity to claim IPRs over their employees’ inventions, mainly under the form of co-ownership with business companies. This result varies with the technological class of the patent, the presence and age of a technology transfer office within the university, and the university size and type.
引用
收藏
页码:211 / 239
页数:28
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]  
Azagra-Caro J(2006)Patent production at a European research university: exploring evidence at the laboratory level J Technol Transf 31 257-268
[2]  
Carayol N(2006)Institutional changes and the commercialization of academic knowledge: a study of Italian universities’ patenting activities between 1965 and 2002 Res Policy 35 518-532
[3]  
Llerena P(2006)La production de brevets par les chercheurs et enseignants-chercheurs Econ Prévis 4 117-134
[4]  
Baldini N(1985)British technology group - UK technology transfer grows Nature 316 385-24
[5]  
Grimaldi R(2003)Research universities and local economic development: lessons from the history of Johns Hopkins University Ind Innov 10 5-632
[6]  
Sobrero M(2001)The changing rationale for European university research funding: are there negative unintended consequences J Econ Issue 35 607-807
[7]  
Carayol N(2006)University patenting and its effects on academic research: the emerging European evidence Res Policy 35 790-1240
[8]  
Clarke M(1984)Specification tests for the multinomial logit model Econometrica 52 1219-132
[9]  
Feldman MP(1998)Universities as a source of commercial technology: a detailed analysis of university patenting 1965–88 Rev Econ Stat 80 119-557
[10]  
Desrochers P(2000)The US patent system in transition: policy innovation and the innovation process Res Policy 29 531-259