Inequities in Medically Assisted Reproduction: a Scoping Review

被引:0
作者
Abbi Huddleston
Kaylin Ray
Rigel Bacani
Jordan Staggs
Reece M. Anderson
Matt Vassar
机构
[1] Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences,Office of Medical Student Research
[2] Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences,Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences
来源
Reproductive Sciences | 2023年 / 30卷
关键词
Medically assisted reproduction; Healthcare inequities; Scoping review; Infertility;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Infertility has a high prevalence in the USA and health inequities play a large role in access to medically assisted reproduction (MAR). The aim of this study was to identify gaps in research pertaining to inequities in MAR and propose suggestions for future research directions. Searches were performed using MEDLINE and Ovid Embase. Articles that reported on MAR inequities, published between 2016 and 2021 in the USA, and written in English were included. The inequities investigated were adapted from the NIH-designated health disparities populations. Each article’s inequity findings were extracted and reported, along with frequencies of inequities. Our sample included 66 studies. The majority of the studies investigated MAR outcomes by race/ethnicity and found that historically marginalized populations had poorer outcomes. LGBTQ + populations were less likely to use MAR or seek infertility care. Most studies found positive correlations with MAR use with income and education. The least commonly studied inequities in our sample were sex and/or gender and rural/under-resourced populations; findings showed that men and people from rural/under-resourced populations were less likely to access MAR. Studies that examined occupational status had varying findings. We suggest that future research be targeted toward: (1) standardizing and diversifying race/ethnicity reporting regarding MAR, (2) the use of community-based participatory research to increase data for LGBTQ + patients, and (3) increasing access to infertility care for men.
引用
收藏
页码:2373 / 2396
页数:23
相关论文
共 283 条
  • [1] Murugappan G(2021)Association between infertility and all-cause mortality: analysis of US claims data Am J Obstet Gynecol 225 57.e1-57.e11
  • [2] Li S(2017)Obesity and female infertility: potential mediators of obesity’s impact Fertil Steril 107 840-847
  • [3] Alvero RJ(2015)Age-related infertility Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 42 15-25
  • [4] Luke B(2019)Disparities in accessing infertility care in the United States: results from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2013–16 Fertil Steril 112 562-568
  • [5] Eisenberg ML(2018)Infertility, inequality, and how lack of insurance coverage compromises reproductive autonomy AMA J Ethics 20 E1152-E1159
  • [6] Broughton DE(2018)Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach BMC Med Res Methodol 18 143-473
  • [7] Moley KH(2018)PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and explanation Ann Intern Med 169 467-54
  • [8] Crawford NM(2016)Comparing the coverage, recall, and precision of searches for 120 systematic reviews in Embase, MEDLINE, and Google Scholar: a prospective study Syst Rev 1 39-1118
  • [9] Steiner AZ(2016)Rayyan-a web and mobile app for systematic reviews Syst Rev 5 210-753
  • [10] Kelley AS(2020)Excluding non-English publications from evidence-syntheses did not change conclusions: a meta-epidemiological study J Clin Epidemiol 118 42-815