Methods for identifying green infrastructure

被引:0
作者
Erica Honeck
Arthur Sanguet
Martin A. Schlaepfer
Nicolas Wyler
Anthony Lehmann
机构
[1] University of Geneva,enviroSPACE Lab, Institute for Environmental Sciences
[2] Conservatory and Botanical Garden of the City of Geneva,Department F.
[3] Switzerland,A. Forel of Environmental and Aquatic Sciences
[4] University of Geneva,undefined
来源
SN Applied Sciences | 2020年 / 2卷
关键词
Green infrastructure; Spatial conservation prioritization; Biodiversity; Ecosystem services; Connectivity;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Nature forms interdependent networks in a landscape, which is key to the survival of species and the maintenance of genetic diversity. Nature provides crucial socio-economic benefits to people, but they are typically undervalued in political decisions. This has led to the concept of Green Infrastructure (GI), which defines an interlinked network of (semi-)natural areas with high ecological values for wildlife and people, to be conserved and managed in priority to preserve biodiversity and ecosystem services. This relatively new concept has been used in different contexts, but with widely diverging interpretations. There is no apparent consensus in the scientific literature on the methodology to map and implement GI. This paper serves as an informed primer for researchers that are new to GI mapping understand the key principles and terminology for the needs of their own case-study, and as a framework for more advance researchers willing to contribute to the formalization of the concept. Through a literature review of articles on creating GI networks, we summarized and evaluated commonly used methods to identify and map GI. We provided key insights for the assessment of diversity, ecosystem services and landscape connectivity, the three ‘pillars’ on which GI identification is based according to its definition. Based on this literature review, we propose 5 theoretical levels toward a more complex, reliable and integrative approach to identify GI networks. We then discuss the applications and limits of such method and point out future challenges for GI identification and implementation.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 629 条
[1]  
Albert CH(2017)Applying network theory to prioritize multispecies habitat networks that are robust to climate and land-use change Conserv Biol 31 1383-1396
[2]  
Rayfield B(2013)Assembling the pieces: a framework for the integration of multi-functional ecological main structure in the emerging urban region of Bogotá, Colombia Urban Ecosyst 16 723-739
[3]  
Dumitru M(2014)Protected areas in boreal Canada: a baseline and considerations for the continued development of a representative and effective reserve network Environ Rev 22 135-160
[4]  
Gonzalez A(2017)Gap analysis as a basis for strategic spatial planning of green infrastructure: a case study in the Ukrainian Carpathians Écoscience 24 41-58
[5]  
Andrade GI(2007)Ensemble forecasting of species distributions Trends Ecol Evol 22 42-47
[6]  
Remolina F(2016)Fish conservation in freshwater and marine realms: status, threats and management Aquat Conserv Mar Freshw Ecosyst 26 838-857
[7]  
Wiesner D(2017)Using the concepts of green infrastructure and ecosystem services to specify Leitbilder for compact and green cities—the example of the landscape plan of Dresden (Germany) Sustainability 9 198-1044
[8]  
Andrew ME(2018)The role of urban agriculture as a nature-based solution: a review for developing a systemic assessment framework Sustainability 10 1937-118
[9]  
Wulder MA(2019)HESS opinions: socio-economic and ecological trade-offs of flood management–benefits of a transdisciplinary approach Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 23 1035-39
[10]  
Cardille JA(2002)Spatial prediction of species distribution: an interface between ecological theory and statistical modelling Ecol Model 157 101-226