Aggressive surgery could overcome the extent of initial peritoneal dissemination for advanced ovarian, fallopian tube, and peritoneal carcinoma

被引:0
作者
Kyoko Nishikimi
Shinichi Tate
Ayumu Matsuoka
Makio Shozu
机构
[1] Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine,Department of Gynecology
来源
Scientific Reports | / 10卷
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
We examined whether the extent of initial peritoneal dissemination affected the prognosis of patients with advanced ovarian, fallopian tube, and peritoneal carcinoma when initially disseminated lesions > 1 cm in diameter were removed, regardless of the timing of aggressive cytoreductive surgery. The extent of peritoneal dissemination was assessed by the peritoneal cancer index (PCI) at initial laparotomy in 186 consecutive patients with stage IIIC/IV. Sixty patients underwent primary debulking surgery and 109 patients underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery. Seventeen patients could not undergo debulking surgery because of disease progression during neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The median initial PCI were 17. Upper abdominal surgery and bowel resection were performed in 149 (80%) and 171 patients (92%), respectively. Residual disease ≤ 1 cm after surgery was achieved in 164 patients (89%). The initial PCI was not significantly associated with progression-free survival (PFS; p = 0.13) and overall survival (OS; p = 0.09). No residual disease and a high-complexity surgery significantly prolonged PFS (p < 0.01 and p = 0.02, respectively) and OS (p < 0.01 and p ≤ 0.01, respectively). The extent of initial peritoneal dissemination did not affect the prognosis when initially disseminated lesions > 1 cm were resected.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]  
Prat J(2014)FIGO Committee on Gynecologic Oncology. Staging classification for cancer of the ovary, fallopian tube, and peritoneum Int. J. Gynecol. Obstet. 124 1-5
[2]  
Griffiths CT(1975)Surgical resection of tumor bulk in the primary treatment of ovarian carcinoma Natl. Cancer Inst. Monogr. 42 101-104
[3]  
Bristow RE(2002)Survival effect of maximal cytoreductive surgery for advanced ovarian carcinoma during the platinum era: a meta-analysis J. Clin. Oncol. 20 1248-1259
[4]  
Tomacruz RS(2007)Prognostic factors for complete debulking in advanced ovarian cancer and its impact on survival. An exploratory analysis of a prospectively randomized phase III study of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynaekologische Onkologie Ovarian Cancer Study Group (AGO-OVAR) Gynecol. Oncol. 106 69-74
[5]  
Armstrong DK(2006)The addition of extensive upper abdominal surgery to achieve optimal cytoreduction improves survival in patients with stages IIIC-IV epithelial ovarian cancer Gynecol. Oncol. 103 1083-1090
[6]  
Trimble EL(2006)Aggressive surgical effort and improved survival in advanced-stage ovarian cancer Obstet. Gynecol. 107 77-85
[7]  
Montz FJ(2009)Improved progression-free and overall survival in advanced ovarian cancer as a result of a change in surgical paradigm Gynecol. Oncol. 114 26-31
[8]  
Wimberger P(2003)Peritoneal cancer index: a prognostic indicator of survival in advanced ovarian cancer Eur. J. Surg. Oncol. 29 69-73
[9]  
Eisenhauer EL(2005)Does aggressive surgery only benefit patients with less advanced ovarian cancer? Results from an international comparison within the SCOTROC-1 Trial J. Clin. Oncol. 23 8802-8811
[10]  
Aletti GD(2009)Intra-abdominal tumor dissemination pattern and surgical outcome in 214 patients with primary ovarian cancer J. Surg. Oncol. 99 424-427