Comparative study of conventional and artificial neural network-based ETo estimation models

被引:0
作者
M. Kumar
A. Bandyopadhyay
N. S. Raghuwanshi
R. Singh
机构
[1] Vivekananda Institute of Hill Agriculture (Indian Council of Agricultural Research),SWCE
[2] National Institute of Hydrology,Centre for Flood Management Studies (Brahmaputra Basin)
[3] Indian Institute of Technology,Agricultural and Food Engineering Department
来源
Irrigation Science | 2008年 / 26卷
关键词
Artificial Neural Network; Hide Layer; Artificial Neural Network Model; Training Scheme; Humid Region;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Accurate estimation of reference crop evapotranspiration (ETo) is required for several hydrological studies and thus, in the past, a number of ETo estimation methods have been developed with different degree of complexity and data requirement. The present study was carried out to develop artificial neural network (ANN) based reference crop evapotranspiration models corresponding to the ASCE’s best ranking conventional ETo estimation methods (Jensen et al. ASCE Manual and Rep. on Engrg. Pract. no. 70, 1990). Among the radiation methods, FAO-24 radiation (or Rad) method for arid and Turc method for humid region, and among the temperature methods, FAO-24 Blaney–Criddle (or BC) method were studied. The ANN architectures corresponding to the above three less data-intensive methods were developed for four CIMIS (California Irrigation Management Information System) stations, namely, Davis, Castroville, Mulberry, and West Side Field station. The comprehensive ANN architecture developed by Kumar et al. (J Irrig Drain Eng 128(4):224–233, 2002) corresponding to Penman–Monteith (PM) ETo for Davis was also tried for the other three stations. Daily meteorological data for a period of more than 10 years (01 January 1990 to 30 June 2000) were collected from these stations and were used to train, test, and validate the ANN models. Two learning schemes, namely, standard back-propagation with learning rate of 0.2 and standard back-propagation with momentum having learning rate of 0.2 and momentum term of 0.95 were considered. ETo estimation performance of the ANN models was compared with the FAO-56 PM method. It was found that the ANN models gave better closeness to FAO-56 PM ETo than the best ranking method in each category (radiation and temperature). Thus these models can be used for ETo estimation in agreement with climatic data availability, when not all required climatic variables are observed.
引用
收藏
页码:531 / 545
页数:14
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]  
Allen RG(1986)A Penman for all seasons J Irrig Drain Eng 112 348-368
[2]  
Allen RG(1989)Operational estimates of reference evapotranspiration J Agron 81 650-662
[3]  
Jensen ME(2000)Artificial neural networks in hydrology—I: preliminary concepts J Hydrol Eng 5 115-123
[4]  
Wright JL(2000)Artificial neural networks in hydrology—II: hydrologic applications J Hydrol Eng 5 124-137
[5]  
Burman RD(1956)Some remarks on Penman’s equations for the evapotranspiration Neth J Agric Sci 4 77-21
[6]  
Businger JA(1995)Penman–Monteith, FAO-24 reference crop evapotranspiration and class-A pan data in Australia Agric Water Manag 28 9-802
[7]  
Chiew FHS(1991)Neural networks applications in hydrology and water resources engineering Proc Int Hydrol Water Resour Symp 3 797-108
[8]  
Kamaladassa NN(2001)Hydrological modeling using artificial neural network Prog Phys Geogr 25 80-2530
[9]  
Malano HM(1995)Artificial neural network modeling of the rainfall-runoff process Water Resour Res 31 2517-448
[10]  
McMohan TA(2003)Comparison of reference evapotranspiration calculations as part of the ASCE standardization effort J Irrig Drain Eng 129 440-233