Comparison of Significant Carotid Stenosis for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma between Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy and Conventional Two-Dimensional Radiotherapy

被引:0
作者
Wang Liao
Haihong Zhou
Shengnuo Fan
Yuqiu Zheng
Bei Zhang
Zhongyan Zhao
Songhua Xiao
Shoumin Bai
Jun Liu
机构
[1] Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital,Department of Neurology
[2] Sun Yat-sen University,Department of Psychiatry
[3] McLean Hospital,Department of Neurology
[4] Harvard Medical School,Department of Neurology
[5] Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University,Department of Neurology
[6] the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Pharmaceutical University,Department of Oncology
[7] People’s Hospital of Hainan Province,Guangdong Province Key Laboratory of Brain Function and Disease
[8] Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital,Laboratory of RNA and Major Diseases of Brain and Heart
[9] Sun Yat-sen University,undefined
[10] Zhongshan School of Medicine,undefined
[11] Sun Yat-sen University,undefined
[12] Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital,undefined
[13] Sun Yat-sen University,undefined
来源
Scientific Reports | / 8卷
关键词
Carotid Stenosis; Significant Stenosis; Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma (NPC); Intensity-modulated Radiotherapy; Radiation (RT);
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Radiotherapy (RT) serves as the most efficient treatment for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) and can cause carotid stenosis. This work compared the incidence of significant carotid stenosis between intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and two-dimensional conventional radiotherapy (2D-RT) for NPC and explored the risk factors. We retrospectively reviewed 233 cases with NPC who underwent carotid ultrasound post IMRT or 2D-RT from 2006 to 2015. The incidence of significant stenosis after RT was 19.3%. Significant stenosis was identified in 20 (14.6%) of 137 patients treated with IMRT and 25 (26.0%) of 96 patients with 2D-RT, respectively (p = 0.035). Multivariate logistic analysis indicated age (odds ratio = 1.054, 95% CI = 1.011–1.099, p = 0.014), radiation technique (IMRT) (odds ratio = 0.471, 95%CI = 0.241–0.919, p = 0.027) and time interval (odds ratio = 1.068, 95%CI = 1.033–1.105, p = 0.001) as independent predictors for significant carotid stenosis. Our study suggests that IMRT was associated with decreased incidence of significant carotid stenosis versus 2D-RT for NPC. Prevention and carotid ultrasound should be considered for older NPC survivors with longer interval from RT, especially those treated with 2D-RT.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 74 条
[1]  
Jemal A(2011)Global cancer statistics CA Cancer J Clin 61 69-90
[2]  
Wei WI(2005)Nasopharyngeal carcinoma Lancet 365 2041-2054
[3]  
Sham JS(2016)Nasopharyngeal carcinoma Lancet 387 1012-1024
[4]  
Chua MLK(2013)Late-onset radiation-induced optic neuropathy after radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma J Clin Neurosci 20 702-706
[5]  
Wee JTS(2014)Radiation-induced brachial plexus injury after radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma Jpn J Clin Oncol 44 736-742
[6]  
Hui EP(2015)Relationship between histologic features and outcomes of carotid revascularization for radiation-induced stenosis Journal of vascular surgery 62 370-377.e371
[7]  
Chan ATC(2014)Radiation-induced carotid artery stenosis: a comprehensive review of the literature Interventional neurology 2 183-192
[8]  
Zhao Z(2013)Radiation-induced temporal lobe injury for nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a comparison of intensity-modulated radiotherapy and conventional two-dimensional radiotherapy PloS one 8 e67488-197
[9]  
Gu B(2015)Incidence of and Risk Factors for Mastoiditis after Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma PloS one 10 e0131284-686
[10]  
Sano N(2017)Ultrasound Evaluation of Carotid Atherosclerosis in Post-Radiotherapy Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Patients, Type 2 Diabetics, and Healthy Controls Ultraschall in der Medizin (Stuttgart, Germany: 1980) 38 190-838