Vocational Rehabilitation From the Client’s Perspective Using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) as a Reference

被引:0
作者
Andrea Glässel
Monika E. Finger
Alarcos Cieza
Christine Treitler
Michaela Coenen
Reuben Escorpizo
机构
[1] Swiss Paraplegic Research (SPF),Institute for Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Research Unit for Biopsychosocial Health
[2] ICF Research Branch of WHO Collaborating Centre for the Family of International Classifications in German,Department of Health Sciences and Health Policy
[3] ICF Research Branch of WHO Collaborating Centre for the Family of International Classifications in German,undefined
[4] Rehaklinik Bellikon,undefined
[5] Ludwig-Maximilians Universität,undefined
[6] Berufsförderungswerk München,undefined
[7] University of Lucerne and SPF,undefined
来源
Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation | 2011年 / 21卷
关键词
ICF; Vocational rehabilitation; Qualitative study; Client perspective; Focus groups;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction A mixed-methods (qualitative-quantitative), multicenter study was conducted using a focus group design to explore the lived experiences of persons in vocational rehabilitation (VR) with regard to functioning and contextual factors using six open-ended questions related to the ICF components. The results were classified by using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) as a frame of reference. Methods The meaningful concepts within the transcribed data were identified and linked to ICF categories according to established linking rules. Results The seven focus groups with 26 participants yielded a total of 4,813 relevant concepts which were linked to a total of 160 different second-level ICF categories. From the client perspective, the ICF components (a) body functions, (b) activities and participation and (c) environmental factors were equally represented, while (d) body structures appeared less frequently. Out of the total number of concepts, 864 concepts (18%) were assigned to the ICF component personal factors which is not yet classified but could indicate important aspects of resource management and strategy development of patients in VR. Conclusion Therefore, VR of patients must not be limited to anatomical and pathophysiologic changes, but should also consider a more comprehensive view which includes client’s demands, strategies and resources in daily life and the context around the individual and social circumstances of their work situation.
引用
收藏
页码:167 / 178
页数:11
相关论文
共 168 条
[1]  
Selander J(2002)Return to work following vocational rehabilitation for neck, back and shoulder problems: risk factors reviewed Disabil Rehabil 24 704-712
[2]  
Marnetoft S(2010)Employment maintenance and the factors that impact it after vocational rehabilitation and return to work Disabil Rehabil 32 1621-1632
[3]  
Bergroth A(2007)Work-ability evaluation: a piece of cake or a hard nut to crack? Disabil Rehabil 29 1295-1300
[4]  
Ekholm J(2009)Barriers, activities and participation: incorporating ICF into service planning datasets Disabil Rehabil 31 2073-2080
[5]  
Young AE(2009)Beyond diagnosis: understanding the healthcare challenges of injured veterans through the application of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) Clin Neuropsychol 23 1416-1432
[6]  
Slebus FG(2007)Using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) in job placement Work 29 277-286
[7]  
Sluiter JK(2010)Factors related to return to work by women with breast cancer in northern France J Occup Rehabil 20 49-58
[8]  
Kuijer PP(2010)Assessing factors influencing return back to work after cholecystectomy: a qualitative research BMC Gastroenterol 10 12-418
[9]  
Willems JH(2009)Experience of the implementation of a multi-stakeholder return-to-work programme J Occup Rehabil 19 409-52
[10]  
Frings-Dresen MH(2000)Qualitative research in health care: assessing quality in qualitative research BMJ 320 50-116