Synthetic polymeric biomaterials for wound healing: a review

被引：355
作者：
Mir M. [1 ]
Ali M.N. [1 ]
Barakullah A. [1 ]
Gulzar A. [1 ]
Arshad M. [1 ]
Fatima S. [1 ]
Asad M. [1 ]
机构：
[1] Biomedical Engineering and Sciences Department, School of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering (SMME), National University of Sciences and Technology (NUST), Sector H-12, Islamabad
来源：
Progress in Biomaterials | 2018年 / 7卷 / 1期
关键词：
Bio-engineering skin substitutes; Hydrocolloids; Hydrogels; Polymeric biomaterials; Wound healing;
D O I：
10.1007/s40204-018-0083-4
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
Wounds are of a variety of types and each category has its own distinctive healing requirements. This realization has spurred the development of a myriad of wound dressings, each with specific characteristics. It is unrealistic to expect a singular dressing to embrace all characteristics that would fulfill generic needs for wound healing. However, each dressing may approach the ideal requirements by deviating from the ‘one size fits all approach’, if it conforms strictly to the specifications of the wound and the patient. Indeed, a functional wound dressing should achieve healing of the wound with minimal time and cost expenditures. This article offers an insight into several different types of polymeric materials clinically used in wound dressings and the events taking place at cellular level, which aid the process of healing, while the biomaterial dressing interacts with the body tissue. Hence, the significance of using synthetic polymer films, foam dressings, hydrocolloids, alginate dressings, and hydrogels has been reviewed, and the properties of these materials that conform to wound-healing requirements have been explored. A special section on bioactive dressings and bioengineered skin substitutes that play an active part in healing process has been re-examined in this work. © 2018, The Author(s).
引用
收藏
页码：1 / 21
页数：20
相关论文
共 178 条
[1]  
Ahn C., Mulligan P., Salcido R.S., Smoking-the bane of wound healing: biomedical interventions and social influences, Adv Skin Wound Care, 21, 5, pp. 227-236, (2008)
[2]  
Akturk O., Tezcaner A., Bilgili H., Deveci M.S., Gecit M.R., Keskin D., Evaluation of sericin/collagen membranes as prospective wound dressing biomaterial, J Biosci Bioeng, 112, pp. 279-288, (2011)
[3]  
Alrubaiy L., Al-Rubaiy K.K., Skin substitutes: a brief review of types and clinical applications, Oman Med J, 24, 1, (2009)
[4]  
Arnold-Long M., Johnson R., Reed L., Negative pressure wound therapy overlay technique with collagen dressings for nonhealing wounds, J Wound Ostomy Cont Nurs, 37, 5, pp. 549-553, (2010)
[5]  
Atiyeh B.S., Amm C.A., El Musa K.A., Improved scar quality following primary and secondary healing of cutaneous wounds, Aesthet Plast Surg, 27, 5, pp. 411-417, (2003)
[6]  
Atiyeh B.S., El-Musa K.A., Dham R., Scar quality and physiologic barrier function restoration after moist and moist-exposed dressings of partial-thickness wounds, Dermatol Surg, 29, 1, pp. 14-20, (2003)
[7]  
Bao X., Hayashi K., Li Y., Eramoto A., Abe K., Novel agarose and agar fibers: fabrication and characterization, Mater Lett, 64, 22, pp. 2435-2437, (2010)
[8]  
Baoyong L., Jian Z., Denglong C., Min L., Evaluation of a new type of wound dressing made from recombinant spider silk protein using rat models, Burn, 36, pp. 891-896, (2010)
[9]  
Basu P., Uttamchand N.K., Inderchand M., Wound healing materials—a perspective for skin tissue engineering, Curr Sci, 112, pp. 2392-2404, (2017)
[10]  
Baum C.L., Arpey C.J., Normal cutaneous wound healing: clinical correlation with cellular and molecular events, Dermatol Surg, 31, 6, pp. 674-686, (2005)
12345678910