Fusion of 3D QCA and IVUS/OCT

被引:0
作者
Shengxian Tu
Niels R. Holm
Gerhard Koning
Zheng Huang
Johan H. C. Reiber
机构
[1] Leiden University Medical Center,Division of Image Processing, Department of Radiology
[2] Aarhus University Hospital,Department of Cardiology
[3] Nanfang Hospital Affiliated to Southern Medical University,Department of Cardiology
[4] Medis Medical Imaging Systems BV,Department of Applied Research
来源
The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging | 2011年 / 27卷
关键词
Intravascular ultrasound; Optical coherence tomography; Quantitative coronary angiography; Three-dimensional reconstruction;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The combination/fusion of quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)/optical coherence tomography (OCT) depends to a great extend on the co-registration of X-ray angiography (XA) and IVUS/OCT. In this work a new and robust three-dimensional (3D) segmentation and registration approach is presented and validated. The approach starts with standard QCA of the vessel of interest in the two angiographic views (either biplane or two monoplane views). Next, the vessel of interest is reconstructed in 3D and registered with the corresponding IVUS/OCT pullback series by a distance mapping algorithm. The accuracy of the registration was retrospectively evaluated on 12 silicone phantoms with coronary stents implanted, and on 24 patients who underwent both coronary angiography and IVUS examinations of the left anterior descending artery. Stent borders or sidebranches were used as markers for the validation. While the most proximal marker was set as the baseline position for the distance mapping algorithm, the subsequent markers were used to evaluate the registration error. The correlation between the registration error and the distance from the evaluated marker to the baseline position was analyzed. The XA-IVUS registration error for the 12 phantoms was 0.03 ± 0.32 mm (P = 0.75). One OCT pullback series was excluded from the phantom study, since it did not cover the distal stent border. The XA-OCT registration error for the remaining 11 phantoms was 0.05 ± 0.25 mm (P = 0.49). For the in vivo validation, two patients were excluded due to insufficient image quality for the analysis. In total 78 sidebranches were identified from the remaining 22 patients and the registration error was evaluated on 56 markers. The registration error was 0.03 ± 0.45 mm (P = 0.67). The error was not correlated to the distance between the evaluated marker and the baseline position (P = 0.73). In conclusion, the new XA-IVUS/OCT co-registration approach is a straightforward and reliable solution to combine X-ray angiography and IVUS/OCT imaging for the assessment of the extent of coronary artery disease. It provides the interventional cardiologist with detailed information about vessel size and plaque size at every position along the vessel of interest, making this a suitable tool during the actual intervention.
引用
收藏
页码:197 / 207
页数:10
相关论文
共 90 条
[1]  
Reiber JHC(1985)Assessment of short-, medium-, and long-term variations in arterial dimensions from computer-assisted quantitation of coronary cineangiograms Circulation 71 280-288
[2]  
Serruys PW(2007)A new quantitative analysis system for the evaluation of coronary bifurcation lesions: comparison with current conventional methods Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 69 172-180
[3]  
Kooijman CJ(2009)Three-dimensional reconstruction allows accurate quantification and length measurements of coronary artery stenoses EuroIntervention 5 127-132
[4]  
Goktekin O(2010)A novel three-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography system: in vivo comparison with intravascular ultrasound for assessing arterial segment length Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 76 291-298
[5]  
Kaplan S(2008)Quantitative multi-modality imaging analysis of a bioabsorbable poly-L-lactid acid stent design in the acute phase: a comparison between 2 and 3D-QCA, QCU and QMSCT-CA EuroIntervention 4 285-291
[6]  
Dimopoulos K(2009)In vivo validation of CAAS QCA-3D coronary reconstruction using fusion of angiography and intravascular ultrasound (ANGUS) Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 73 620-626
[7]  
Rittger H(2010)Assessment of obstruction length and optimal viewing angle from biplane X-ray angiograms Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 26 5-17
[8]  
Schertel B(2005)Angiographic views used for percutaneous coronary interventions: a three dimensional analysis of physician-determined vs computer-generated views Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 64 451-459
[9]  
Schmidt M(2009)Three-dimensional coronary imaging for the ostium of the left anterior descending artery Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 25 223-228
[10]  
Tu S(2007)Utility of three-dimensional reconstruction of coronary angiography to guide percutaneous coronary intervention Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 69 479-482