Income and Mental Well-Being: Personality Traits as Moderators

被引:0
作者
Susanne M. Syrén
Katja Kokko
Lea Pulkkinen
Jaakko Pehkonen
机构
[1] University of Jyväskylä,Jyväskylä University School of Business and Economics
[2] University of Jyväskylä,Gerontology Research Center and Faculty of Sport and Health Sciences
[3] University of Jyväskylä,Department of Psychology
来源
Journal of Happiness Studies | 2020年 / 21卷
关键词
Mental well-being; Emotional well-being; Psychological well-being; Social well-being; Depression; Income; Big Five personality traits;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Using data from the participants of the Jyväskylä Longitudinal Study of Personality and Social Development (JYLS) at ages 42 and 50 (N = 326), this study provides empirical evidence of the relation between income and mental well-being and of the possible role of personality traits in modifying this relation. The relationships were analyzed using pooled ordinary least squares (OLS; bi- and multivariate settings) and fixed effects estimations (FE; multivariate settings). Positive bivariate associations were found between gross monthly income and the sum score of mental well-being and its separate dimensions (emotional, psychological, and social well-being and the absence of depression) as well as between experienced household finances and the sum score of mental well-being and its separate dimensions (except for social well-being). The multivariate OLS analyses detected positive relationships between gross monthly income and the absence of depression and between experienced household finances and mental well-being, along with one of its dimensions, i.e., emotional well-being. Further, the marginal utility of income appeared to depend on personality traits (FE): agreeableness and extraversion negatively moderated the gross monthly income–emotional well-being relationship, while openness positively moderated this relationship. In addition to emotional well-being, extraversion negatively moderated the relationship between gross monthly income and general mental well-being, and neuroticism negatively moderated the association between gross monthly income and social well-being.
引用
收藏
页码:547 / 571
页数:24
相关论文
共 155 条
[1]  
Angeles L(2011)A closer look at the Easterlin paradox The Journal of Socio-Economics 40 67-73
[2]  
Anger S(2017)Involuntary job loss and changes in personality traits Journal of Economic Psychology 60 71-91
[3]  
Camehl G(2011)Personality and the marginal utility of income: Personality interacts with increases in household income to determine life satisfaction Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 78 183-191
[4]  
Peter F(2013)Is personality fixed? Personality changes as much as “variable” economic factors and more strongly predicts changes to life satisfaction Social Indicators Research 111 287-305
[5]  
Boyce CJ(2016)Household finances and well-being in Australia: An empirical analysis of comparison effects Journal of Economic Psychology 53 17-36
[6]  
Wood AM(2014)Household finances and the ‘Big Five’ personality traits Journal of Economic Psychology 45 197-212
[7]  
Boyce CJ(2005)Debt and distress: Evaluating the psychological cost of credit Journal of Economic Psychology 26 642-663
[8]  
Wood A(2008)Relative income, happiness, and utility: An explanation for the Easterlin paradox and other puzzles Journal of Economic Literature 46 95-144
[9]  
Powdthavee N(2008)Income, health, and well-being around the world: Evidence from the Gallup World Poll The Journal of Economic Perspectives 22 53-72
[10]  
Brown S(1984)Subjective well-being Psychological Bulletin 95 542-575