Article-count impact factor of materials science journals in SCI database

被引:0
作者
T. Markpin
B. Boonradsamee
K. Ruksinsut
W. Yochai
N. Premkamolnetr
P. Ratchatahirun
N. Sombatsompop
机构
[1] Environment and Materials King Mongkut’s University of Technology Thonburi (KMUTT),Polymer Processing and Flow (P
[2] King Mongkut’s University of Technology Thonburi (KMUTT),PROF) Group, School of Energy
[3] King Mongkut’s University of Technology Thonburi (KMUTT),Thai
[4] Prince of Songkla University,Journal Citation Index (TCI) Centre, KMUTT Library
来源
Scientometrics | 2008年 / 75卷
关键词
Impact Factor; Science Citation Index; Metallurgical Engineer; Journal Impact Factor; Metallurgical Engineering;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This article proposed a new index, so-called “Article-Count Impact Factor” (ACIF) for evaluating journal quality in light of citation behaviour in comparison with the ISI journal impact factors. The ACIF index was the ratio of the number of articles that were cited in the current year to the source items published in that journal during the previous two years. In this work, we used 171 journal titles in materials categories published in the years of 2001–2004 in international journals indexed in the Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI) database as data source. It was found that ACIF index could be used as an alternative tool in assessing the journal quality, particularly in the case where the assessed journals had the same (equal or similar) JIF values. The experimental results suggested that the higher the ACIF value, the more the number of articles being cited. The changes in ACIF values were more dependent on the JIF values rather than the total number of articles. Polymer Science had the greatest ACIF values, suggesting that the articles in Polymer Science had greater “citation per article” than those in Metallurgical Engineering and Ceramics. It was also suggested that in order to increase a JIF value of 1.000, Ceramics category required more articles to be cited as compared to Metallurgical Engineering and Polymer Science categories.
引用
收藏
页码:251 / 261
页数:10
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [1] Adam D.(2002)The counting house Nature 415 726-729
  • [2] Bordons M.(2002)Advantages and limitations in the use of impact factor measures for the assessment of research performance in a peripheral country Scientometrics 53 195-206
  • [3] Fernandez M. T.(2003)Challenging the tyranny of impact factors Nature 423 479-48
  • [4] Gomez I.(2007)Analysis of the most highly cited articles from the 50-year history of CCA Clinica Chimica Acta 375 43-93
  • [5] Colquhoun D.(2001)Impact factors, and why they won’t go away Nature 411 522-193
  • [6] Csako G.(2006)The history and meaning of the journal impact factor JAMA 295 90-322
  • [7] Garfield E.(2002)Journal impact measures in bibliometric research Scientometrics 53 171-1119
  • [8] Garfield E.(1999)Sprucing up one’s impact factor Nature 401 321-683
  • [9] Glänzel W.(2002)Algorithmic procedure for finding semantically related journals Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 53 1113-266
  • [10] Moed H. F.(1997)Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research British Medical Journal 314 497-279