Embodying the False-Belief Tasks

被引:0
作者
Michael Wilby
机构
[1] Anglia Ruskin University,
来源
Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences | 2012年 / 11卷
关键词
The false-belief task; Developmental psychology; Social cognition; Joint attention; Embodied cognition; Intersubjectivity; Theory of mind;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Embodied approaches to mindreading have tended to define themselves in contrast to cognitive approaches to social mindreading. One side effect of this has been a lack of engagement with key areas in the study of social cognition—in particular the topic of how we gain an understanding of the referential nature of others’ thoughts, and how that understanding develops from infancy. I argue that embodied accounts of mindreading are well equipped to enter into this debate, by making use of the notion of a joint mental state, but that doing so will require taking a less antagonistic attitude towards mainstream cognitive approach.
引用
收藏
页码:519 / 540
页数:21
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]  
Apperly I(2009)Do humans have two systems to track beliefs and belief-like states? Psychological Review 116 4-46
[2]  
Butterfill S(1985)Does the autistic child have a theory of mind? Cognition 21 37-B31
[3]  
Baron-Cohen S(2000)Two reasons to abandon the false belief task as a test of the theory of mind Cognition 77 B25-966
[4]  
Leslie A(2002)The importance of eyes: How infants interpret adult’s looking behaviour Developmental Psychology 3 958-95
[5]  
Frith U(2009)Comprehension of the representational mind in infancy Developmental Review 29 69-464
[6]  
Bloom P(2002)Comprehension of the referential intent of looking and pointing between 12 and 15 months of age Journal of Cognition and Development 3 445-542
[7]  
German T(2009)Social understanding through perception? Yes, by interacting Consciousness and Cognition 18 535-447
[8]  
Brooks R(2010)Can social interaction constitute social cognition? Trends in Cognitive Science. 14 441-296
[9]  
Meltzoff A(1992)A theory of the child’s theory of mind Cognition 44 283-107
[10]  
Caron AJ(2001)The practice of mind: Theory, simulation or interaction? Journal of Consciousness Studies 8 83-174