Prioritization of Ecosystem Services Research: Tampa Bay Demonstration Project

被引:0
作者
Marc Russell
John Rogers
Stephen Jordan
Darrin Dantin
James Harvey
Janet Nestlerode
Federico Alvarez
机构
[1] U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
来源
Journal of Coastal Conservation | 2011年 / 15卷
关键词
Ecosystem services; Tampa Bay; Valuation; Conceptual models; Prioritization;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The Tampa Bay Ecosystem Services Demonstration Project (TBESDP) is part of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s Ecosystem Services Research Program. The principal objectives of TBESDP are to (1) quantify the ecosystem services of the Tampa Bay watershed, (2) determine the value of ecosystem services to society, (3) predict the supply of ecosystem services under future scenarios of population growth and climate change, and (4) apply this knowledge through models and tools that will support the best informed environmental decisions possible. The scope and complexity of this project required intensive effort to establish which services can be quantified by applying existing models, data, and scientific literature and which services will require supporting research. Research priorities were assessed by: (1) developing and refining conceptual models of major ecosystems in the Tampa Bay region, (2) gathering input from stakeholders about the relative importance and values of various ecosystem services, (3) preparing and reviewing a bibliometric analysis of the volume of scientific literature relevant to the ecosystems and services of interest, and (4) evaluating an integrated analysis of importance, value, and availability of scientific information. This analysis led us to focus on two research priorities, seagrass-habitat functions as support for fishery production, and wetlands as regulators of water quality.
引用
收藏
页码:647 / 658
页数:11
相关论文
共 68 条
[1]  
Barbier EB(2008)Coastal ecosystem-based management with nonlinear ecological functions and values Science 319 321-323
[2]  
Koch EW(2007)What are ecosystem services? The need for standardized environmental accounting units Ecol Econ 63 616-626
[3]  
Silliman BR(2006)Millennium Ecosystem Assessment: research needs Science 314 257-258
[4]  
Hacker SD(2001)Our evolving conceptual model of the coastal eutrophication problem Mar Ecol Progr Series 210 223-253
[5]  
Wolanski E(1997)The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital Nature 387 253-260
[6]  
Primavera J(2000)The value of nature and the nature of value Science 289 395-396
[7]  
Granek EF(2002)A typology for the description, classification and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Pages 393–408 in The Dynamics and Value of Ecosystem Services: Integrating Economic and Ecological Perspectives Ecol Econ 41 367-567
[8]  
Polasky S(2010)Accounting for natural resources and environmental sustainability: linking ecosystem services to human well-being Environ Sci Technol 44 1530-1536
[9]  
Aswani S(1999)Economic valuation of freshwater ecosystem services in the United States: 1971–1997 Ecol Appl 9 772-783
[10]  
Cramer LA(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined