Care Ethics and the Future of Work: a Different Voice

被引:6
作者
Ley M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Ethics/Philosophy Section, Department of Values, Technology and Innovation, Faculty of Technology, Management and Policy, Delft University of Technology, Jaffalaan 5, Delft
关键词
Care ethics; Embodiment; Emotions; Future of work; Robot ethics;
D O I
10.1007/s13347-022-00604-5
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The discourse on the future of work should learn from a turn in philosophy that occurred in the 1980s, one that recognizes the good life towards which ethics strives can only be reached on a foundation of caring relationships (Gillian, 1982; Noddings, 1984). Care ethics recognizes that human well-being is a group project, one that involves strong relationships, and concern for bodies and emotions. Too often, these features are left out of research exploring robotics in the workplace. This paper outlines the main tenets of care ethics, then applies the moral framework to the context of industrial and retail settings using robots. This approach sees these contexts through a relational lens, helping to identify, evaluate, and improve relationships critical to ensuring workers’ well-being. Second, care ethics considers taking care of people’s bodies beyond mere safety, examining how working with robots can exacerbate societal or economic pressures. Lastly, care ethics takes emotions as an important source of knowledge in building and supporting care. Additionally, this paper contributes to the care ethics literature by applying the framework to the context of robotized industrial workplaces, which has yet to be done. © 2023, The Author(s).
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 77 条
[1]  
Allmark P., Can there be an ethics of care?, Journal of Medical Ethics, 21, pp. 19-24, (1995)
[2]  
Asaro P.M., Ai ethics in predictive policing: From models of threat to an ethics of care, Ieee Technology & Society Magazine, 38, 2, pp. 40-53, (2019)
[3]  
Autor D.H., Why are there still so many jobs? The history and future of workplace automation, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 29, 3, pp. 3-30, (2015)
[4]  
Bendel O., Co-robots from an ethical perspective, Business Information Systems and Technology 4.0: New Trends in the Age of Digital Change, pp. 275-288, (2018)
[5]  
Brynjolfsson E., McAfee A., The second machine age: Work, progress, and prosperity in a time of brilliant technologies, (2016)
[6]  
Bryson J.J., Robots should be slaves, Close Engagements with Artificial Companions: Key Social, Psychological, Ethical and Design Issues, 8, pp. 63-74, (2010)
[7]  
Chatzidakis A., Hakim J., Littler J., Rottenbuerg C., Segal L., The Care Manifesto, (2020)
[8]  
Coeckelbergh M., Robot rights? Towards a social-relational justification of moral consideration, Ethics and Information Technology, 12, pp. 209-221, (2010)
[9]  
Coeckelbergh M., Three responses to anthropomorphism in social robotics: Towards a critical, relational, and hermeneutic approach, International Journal of Social Robotics, (2021)
[10]  
Costanza-Chock S., Design justice: Community-led practices to build the worlds we need, (2020)