Towards Turing Test 2.0—Attribution of Moral Status and Personhood to Human and Non-Human Agents

被引:0
作者
Lukaszewicz A. [1 ]
Fortuna P. [2 ]
机构
[1] Institute of History and Theory of Art, Academy of Art in Szczecin, Szczecin
[2] Department of Experimental Psychology, John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Lublin
关键词
Cyborg; Cyborg person; Embodiment; Human; Mind perception; Moral status; Non-human agent; Person; Positive psychology;
D O I
10.1007/s42438-022-00303-6
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This paper analyzes the recognition of various non-human, differently embodied agents as moral subjects through a reinvention of the Turing test. The paper focuses to recognizing current human approaches to cyborg persons and identifying opportunities for their transformation. The concept of the cyborg is understood literally, as a technologically augmented human person with transformed modes of perception, functioning, and understanding the world and oneself. Empirical part of the study, based on a survey conducted on a sample of 322 Polish men and women, compared different agents: a human person, a cyborg person, a fembot, social robot, an animal, and an algorithm. The study demonstrates that the other creature recognized as moral agent does not need to be a ‘natural’ homo sapiens but can be also an upgraded homo sapiens or a cyborg. People attribute moral status to various agents, human and non-human, and attribution of moral status is not binary: it is gradable, fluid, and transitional, varying on the scale of agency and experience. © 2022, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.
引用
收藏
页码:860 / 876
页数:16
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]  
Abele A., Wojciszke B., Agency and Communion from the Perspective of Self Versus Others, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, pp. 751-763, (2007)
[2]  
(2007)
[3]  
Bawden T., Orangutan inside Argentina zoo granted ‘non-human person rights’ in landmark ruling, Independent, (2004)
[4]  
Biswas-Diener R., From the Equator to the North Pole: A Study of Character Strengths, Journal of Happiness Studies, 7, pp. 293-310, (2006)
[5]  
Castelo N., Blurring the Line Between Human and Machine: Marketing Artificial Intelligence. PhD Dissertation, (2019)
[6]  
Clarke S., Savulescu J., Sanyal S., The Ethics of Human Enhancement. Understanding the Debate, (2016)
[7]  
Clement G., Animals and Moral Agency: The Recent Debate and Its Implication, Journal of Animal Ethics, 3, 1, pp. 1-14, (2013)
[8]  
Cuomo C.J., Feminism and ecological communities: An ethic of flourishing, (1998)
[9]  
Fiske S.T., Cuddy A.J., Glick P., Universal Dimensions of Social Cognition: Warmth and Competence, Trends in Cognitive Sience, 11, pp. 77-83, (2007)
[10]  
Fortuna P., (2021)