The MEPPP Framework: A Framework for Monitoring and Evaluating Participatory Planning Processes

被引:0
作者
Emeline Hassenforder
Jamie Pittock
Olivier Barreteau
Katherine Anne Daniell
Nils Ferrand
机构
[1] National Research Institute of Science and Technology for Environment and Agriculture (IRSTEA),Water Resource Management, Actors and Uses Joint Research Unit (UMR G
[2] AgroParisTech,EAU), Montpellier
[3] The Australian National University (ANU),Fenner School of Environment and Society
[4] The Australian National University,Centre for European Studies
来源
Environmental Management | 2016年 / 57卷
关键词
Complexity; Monitoring and evaluation; Planning; Participatory research; Institutions; Organizations;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Evaluating participatory processes, participatory planning processes especially, can be challenging. Due to their complexity, these processes require a specific approach to evaluation. This paper proposes a framework for evaluating projects that have adopted a participatory planning approach: the monitoring and evaluation of participatory planning processes (MEPPP) framework. The MEPPP framework is applied to one case study, a participatory planning process in the Rwenzori region in Uganda. We suggest that this example can serve as a guideline for researchers and practitioners to set up the monitoring and evaluation of their participatory planning process of interest by following six main phases: (1) description of the case, (2) clarification of the M&E viewpoint(s) and definition of the M&E objective(s), (3) identification of the context, process and outputs/outcomes analytical variables, (4) development of the M&E methods and data collection, (5) data analysis, and (6) sharing of the M&E results. Results of the application of the MEPPP framework in Uganda demonstrate the ability of the framework to tackle the complexity of participatory planning processes. Strengths and limitations of the MEPPP framework are also discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:79 / 96
页数:17
相关论文
共 122 条
  • [1] Anderies JM(2004)A framework to analyze the robustness of social-ecological systems from an institutional perspective Ecol Soc 9 18-245
  • [2] Janssen MA(2010)A framework for clarifying “Participation” in participatory research to prevent its rejection for the wrong reasons Ecol Soc 15 1-602
  • [3] Ostrom E(2010)Participation of marginalized groups in evaluation: mission impossible? Eval Progr Plan 33 238-423
  • [4] Barreteau O(2000)Values, conflict, and trust in participatory environmental planning J Policy Anal Manag 19 587-451
  • [5] Bots PW(2001)A systems approach to the evaluation of natural resource management initiatives J Environ Manag 63 407-742
  • [6] Daniell KA(2001)Participatory local governance and transport planning Environ Plan A 33 431-1320
  • [7] Baur VE(2007)Developing and applying a framework to evaluate participatory research for sustainability Ecol Econ 60 726-136
  • [8] Abma TA(2007)Systemic evaluation: a participative, multi-method approach J Oper Res Soc 58 1306-312
  • [9] Widdershoven GAM(2004)Context-sensitive monitoring and evaluation for the World Bank Policy Sci 37 103-228
  • [10] Beierle TC(2006)How would we know what works?: context and complexity in the evaluation of community involvement Evaluation 12 294-1431