College as Context: Influences on Interpersonal Sexual Scripts

被引:51
作者
Berntson M.A. [1 ]
Hoffman K.L. [1 ]
Luff T.L. [2 ]
机构
[1] Department of Sociology, Roanoke College, 221 College Lane, Salem, VA
[2] Division of Social Sciences, Concord University, Athens, WV
关键词
College students; Gender differences; Hooking up; Sexual relationships; Sexual scripts;
D O I
10.1007/s12119-013-9180-7
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Scripting theory (Gagnon and Simon in Sexual conduct: the social sources of human sexuality, Aldine, Chicago, 1973; Simon and Gagnon in Arch Sex Behav 13:97-120, 1986; Qual Sociol 26:491-497, 2003) is used to examine the impact of religion, gender, social class, and race as well as the college social environment on sexual interaction. Research has investigated how social networks and contexts shape sexual scripts. College campuses are important contexts for sexuality, locating students within peer networks and, given the emergence of a hookup culture, presenting them with multiple options for sexual behavior. Survey data collected from 614 students on two campuses revealed that many types of hooking up and sexual relationships are common. These intimate interactions are conceptualized as interpersonal scripts and classified as relational, recreational, or a combination of those scripts. Findings suggest that hooking up varies by gender, race, alcohol consumption, and perceptions of the hooking up behavior of close friends, but not by social class, Greek affiliation, religiosity, religious attendance, or perceptions of campus norms. Relationships vary only by perceptions of close friends' participation in relationships. The implications of college as a social context for sexual scripts are discussed. © 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York.
引用
收藏
页码:149 / 165
页数:16
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]  
Albanesi, H., (2010) Gender and Sexual Agency: How Young People Make Choices about Sex, , Lanham: Lexington Books
[2]  
Alexander, M.G., Fisher, T.D., Truth and consequence: Using the bogus pipeline to examine sex differences in self-reported sexuality (2003) Journal of Sex Research, 40, pp. 27-35
[3]  
Banker, J.E., Kaestle, C.E., Allen, K.A., Dating is hard work: A narrative approach to understanding sexual and romantic relationships (2010) Contemporary Family Therapy, 32, pp. 173-191
[4]  
Barriger, M., Vélez-Blasini, C.J., Descriptive and injunctive social norm overestimation in hooking up and their role as predictors of hook-up activity in a college student sample (2013) Journal of Sex Research, 50, pp. 84-94
[5]  
Bartoli, A.M., Clark, M.D., The dating game: Similarities and differences in dating scripts among college students (2006) Sexuality and Culture, 10, pp. 54-80
[6]  
Bersamin, M.M., Paschall, M.J., Saltz, R.F., Zamboanga, B.L., Young adults and casual sex: The relevance of college drinking settings (2012) Journal of Sex Research, 49, pp. 274-281
[7]  
Bisson, M.A., Levine, T.P., Negotiating a friends with benefits relationship (2009) Archives of Sexual Behavior, 38, pp. 66-73
[8]  
Bogle, K.A., (2008) Hooking up: Sex, Dating, and Relationships on Campus, , New York: New York University Press
[9]  
Boswell, A.A., Spade, J.Z., Fraternities and collegiate rape culture: Why are some fraternities more dangerous places for women (2000) The Family Experience: A Reader in Cultural Diversity, pp. 89-100. , M. Hutter (Ed.), Boston: Allyn & Bacon
[10]  
Bradshaw, C., Kahn, A.S., Saville, B.K., To hook up or date: Which gender benefits? (2010) Sex Roles, 62, pp. 661-669