Defect band formation in high pressure die casting AE44 magnesium alloy

被引:0
|
作者
Ying-ying Hou
Meng-wu Wu
Feng Huang
Xiao-bo Li
Shou-mei Xiong
机构
[1] Wuhan University of Technology,Hubei Key Laboratory of Advanced Technology for Automotive Components
[2] Tsinghua University,School of Materials Science and Engineering
来源
China Foundry | 2022年 / 19卷
关键词
high pressure die casting; magnesium alloy; AE44; defect band; microstructure; TG146.22; A;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The characteristics of defect bands in the microstructure of high pressure die casting (HPDC) AE44 magnesium alloy were investigated. Special attention was paid to the effects of process parameters during the HPDC process and casting structure on the distribution of defect bands. Results show that the defect bands are solute segregation bands with the enrichment of Al, Ce and La elements, which are basically in the form of Al11RE3 phase. There is no obvious aggregation of porosities in the defect bands. The width of the inner defect band is 4–8 times larger than that of the outer one. The variation trends of the distribution of the inner and outer defect bands are not consistent under different process parameters and at different locations of castings. This is due to the discrepancy between the formation mechanisms of double defect bands. The filling and solidification behavior of the melt near the chilling layer is very complicated, which finally leads to a fluctuation of the width and location of the outer defect band. By affecting the content and aggregation degree of externally solidified crystals (ESCs) in the cross section of die castings, the process parameters and casting structure have a great influence on the distribution of the inner defect band.
引用
收藏
页码:201 / 210
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Development of high thermal conductivity, enhanced strength and cost-effective die-cast Mg alloy compared with AE44 alloy
    Feng, Lingyun
    Dong, Xixi
    Xia, Mingxu
    Zhu, Xiangzhen
    Ji, Gang
    Yang, Hailin
    Wang, Bin
    Nyberg, Eric A.
    Ji, Shouxun
    JOURNAL OF MATERIALS RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY-JMR&T, 2023, 22 : 2955 - 2966
  • [42] Advancements in high pressure die casting of magnesium
    Giestland, H.
    Westengen, H.
    ADVANCED ENGINEERING MATERIALS, 2007, 9 (09) : 769 - 776
  • [43] Formation of defect bands in high pressure die cast magnesium alloys
    Dahle, A.K.
    Sannes, S.
    St., John, D.H.
    Westengen, H.
    2001, Elsevier Ltd (01)
  • [44] Validated numerical modelling of galvanic corrosion for couples: Magnesium alloy (AE44)-mild steel and AE44-aluminium alloy (AA6063) in brine solution
    Deshpande, Kiran B.
    CORROSION SCIENCE, 2010, 52 (10) : 3514 - 3522
  • [45] Mechanisms of segregation band defect formation in pressure die-cast magnesium components
    Cao, HP
    Wessén, M
    MAGNESIUM - SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY AND APPLICATIONS, 2005, 488-489 : 381 - 384
  • [46] Modeling of microstructure evolution of magnesium alloy during the high pressure die casting process
    Wu, Mengwu
    Xiong, Shoumei
    MCWASP XIII: INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MODELING OF CASTING, WELDING AND ADVANCED SOLIDIFICATION PROCESSES, 2012, 33
  • [47] Developing HPDC Mg alloys with enhanced thermal conductivity and high strength in comparison to AE44 alloy
    Zhou, Liping
    Li, Zixin
    Jiang, Zhenfei
    Hu, Bo
    Yao, Fanjin
    Zhang, Qianxi
    Han, Jiaxuan
    Wang, Jinhui
    Zeng, Xiaoqin
    Li, Dejiang
    MATERIALS TODAY COMMUNICATIONS, 2025, 44
  • [48] Microstructure and creep behavior in AE42 magnesium die-casting alloy
    Bob R. Powell
    Vadim Rezhets
    Michael P. Balogh
    Richard A. Waldo
    JOM, 2002, 54 : 34 - 38
  • [49] Microstructure and creep behavior in AE42 magnesium die-casting alloy
    Powell, BR
    Rezhets, V
    Balogh, MP
    Waldo, RA
    JOM-JOURNAL OF THE MINERALS METALS & MATERIALS SOCIETY, 2002, 54 (08): : 34 - 38
  • [50] High pressure die casting of aluminium and magnesium alloys some comparisons of microstructure formation
    Laukli, HI
    Lohne, O
    Arnberg, L
    SHAPING CASTING: THE JOHN CAMPBELL SYMPOSIUM, 2005, : 263 - 272