Item-level psychometrics of the ADL instrument of the Korean National Survey on persons with physical disabilities

被引:0
作者
Ickpyo Hong
Mi Jung Lee
Moon Young Kim
Hae Yean Park
机构
[1] University of Texas Medical Branch,Division of Rehabilitation Sciences
[2] University of Florida,Department of Occupational Therapy
[3] Yonsei University,Department of Occupational Therapy, College of Health Science
来源
Quality of Life Research | 2017年 / 26卷
关键词
Activities of daily living; Assessment; Psychometrics; Item response theory;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
引用
收藏
页码:2867 / 2875
页数:8
相关论文
共 110 条
[1]  
Kim H-O(2007)A study on the needs of health & community services among the disabled at home in rural areas Journal of Korean Academy of Community Health Nursing 18 480-491
[2]  
Joung KH(2014)International survey of older adults finds shortcomings in access, coordination, and patient-centered care Health Affairs 33 2247-2255
[3]  
Osborn R(1994)The disablement process Social Science & Medicine 38 1-14
[4]  
Moulds D(2005)Functional status and disability questionnaires: What do they assess?: A systematic review of back-specific outcome questionnaires Spine 30 130-140
[5]  
Squires D(2002)The ABC of Alzheimer’s disease: ADL and improving day-to-day functioning of patients International Psychogeriatrics 14 7-26
[6]  
Doty MM(2004)Ability to perform activities of daily living is the main factor affecting quality of life in patients with dementia Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 2 1-7
[7]  
Anderson C(1997)A modular case-mix classification system for medical rehabilitation illustrated Health Care Financing Review 19 87-103
[8]  
Verbrugge LM(2003)Measuring function for medicare inpatient rehabilitation payment Health Care Financing Review 24 25-44
[9]  
Jette AM(2002)Self-assessed health and mortality: Could psychosocial factors explain the association? International Journal of Epidemiology 31 1162-1168
[10]  
Grotle M(2016)Measurement of the severity of disability in community-dwelling adults and older adults: Interval-level measures for accurate comparisons in large survey data sets British Medical Journal Open 6 e011842-92