Does EU-accession affect domestic market structures and firm level productivity?

被引:0
作者
Klaus S. Friesenbichler
机构
[1] Austrian Institute of Economic Research (WIFO),
[2] The Ratio Institute,undefined
来源
Empirica | 2020年 / 47卷
关键词
Market concentration; Productivity; EU; Regional integration; Enterprise surveys; ECA; K21; L22; L25; L53; O52;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
We explore the effects of EU-accession on firms in Central and Eastern Europe. We draw on trade theory and institutional reform literature to argue changes in both the perceived market structures and productivity distributions. Using firm level data from six waves of the World Bank’s Enterprise Survey between 2002 and 2013, we document a decreasing likelihood of higher market concentration as countries accede. We show changes in the firm level productivity distributions. EU-membership tends to a decrease the variance of productivity across firms, and shifts the distribution towards higher productivity levels. Less concentrated markets are associated with higher productivity.
引用
收藏
页码:343 / 364
页数:21
相关论文
共 75 条
[1]  
Acemoglu D(2006)Distance to frontier, selection, and economic growth J Eur Econ Assoc 4 37-74
[2]  
Aghion P(2005)Competition and innovation: an inverted-U relationship Q J Econ 120 701-728
[3]  
Zilibotti F(2006)Quantile regression under misspecification, with an application to the U.S. wage structure Econometrica 74 539-563
[4]  
Aghion P(2016)Exporting the competition policy regime of the European Union: success or failure? Empirical evidence for acceding countries J Common Mark Stud 54 569-582
[5]  
Bloom N(2011)Measuring the deterrence properties of competition policy: the competition policy indexes J Compet Law Econ 7 165-204
[6]  
Blundell R(2011)Competition policy and innovation in accession countries: empirical evidence Int J Econ Finance 3 1-10
[7]  
Griffith R(2010)Technology adoption and the investment climate: firm-level evidence for Eastern Europe and Central Asia World Bank Econ Rev 24 121-147
[8]  
Howitt P(2012)Reflections on the relation between competition and innovation J Ind Compet Trade 12 7-19
[9]  
Angrist J(2007)Small sample bias in synthetic cohort models of labor supply J Appl Econom 22 839-848
[10]  
Chernozhukov V(2010)The new member states of the EU in the aftermath of enlargement: do new European rules remain empty shells? Eur J Public Policy 17 137-148