Open economy politics: A critical review

被引:0
作者
David A. Lake
机构
[1] University of California,Department of Political Science
[2] San Diego,undefined
[3] Center for Advanced Study in the Behavioral Sciences,undefined
来源
The Review of International Organizations | 2009年 / 4卷
关键词
Political economy; Globalization; Institutions; Bargaining; Optimal tariffs; Economies of scale; F02; F13; F50; F59;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
An emergent paradigm, referred to as Open Economy Politics (OEP), now structures and guides research among many scholars. This essay sketches the general contours of the paradigm. Scientific accumulation is, in my view, the potential and great benefit of a self-conscious understanding of OEP as a single, unifying paradigm. The essay also provides a sympathetic critique of OEP and shows how the paradigm can be extended to capture some of the concerns and insights of other critics. Most important, this critique highlights the role and consequences of certain simplifying assumptions commonly used in OEP and calls for a closer examination of how international institutions and policies structure and change the interests of actors within countries that are now taken as exogenous.
引用
收藏
页码:219 / 244
页数:25
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]  
Baldwin RE(2000)Is trade policy for sale? Congressional voting on recent trade bills Public Choice 105 79-101
[2]  
Magee SP(1985)Export subsidies and international market share rivalry Journal of International Economics 18 83-100
[3]  
Brander JA(2002)Political system transparency and monetary commitment regimes International Organization 56 861-887
[4]  
Spencer BJ(1986)The political economy of the tariff cycle American Political Science Review 80 843-862
[5]  
Broz JL(1976)Economic models of political choice: Canada’s tariff structure Canadian Journal of Economics 9 278-300
[6]  
Cassing JH(2007)The transatlantic divide: why are American and British IPE so different? Review of International Political Economy 14 197-219
[7]  
McKeown TJ(2009)Striking a nerve Review of International Political Economy 16 136-143
[8]  
Ochs J(1993)Domestic institutions and the credibility of international commitments: Japan and the United States International Organization 47 299-326
[9]  
Caves RE(2009)Ontology, methodology, and causation in the American school of international political economy Review of International Political Economy 16 58-71
[10]  
Cohen BJ(1998)Bargaining, enforcement, and international cooperation International Organization 52 269-305