Comparison and Verification of Bacterial Water Quality Indicator Measurement Methods Using Ambient Coastal Water Samples

被引:0
|
作者
John F. Griffith
Larissa A. Aumand
Ioannice M. Lee
Charles D. Mcgee
Laila L. Othman
Kerry J. Ritter
Kathy O. Walker
Stephen B. Weisberg
机构
[1] Southern California Coastal Water Research Project (SCCWRP),
[2] MEC Analytical Systems,undefined
[3] Inc.,undefined
[4] City of Los Angeles,undefined
[5] Department of Sanitation,undefined
[6] Orange County Sanitation District,undefined
[7] City of San Diego,undefined
[8] Metropolitan Waste Water Department,undefined
[9] Los Angeles County Sanitation District,undefined
来源
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment | 2006年 / 116卷
关键词
fecal indicator bacteria; laboratory intercalibration; method comparison; water quality;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
More than 30 laboratories routinely monitor water along southern California's beaches for bacterial indicators of fecal contamination. Data from these efforts frequently are combined and compared even though three different methods (membrane filtration (MF), multiple tube fermentation (MTF), and chromogenic substrate (CS) methods) are used. To assess data comparability and quantify variability within method and across laboratories, 26 laboratories participated in an intercalibration exercise. Each laboratory processed three replicates from eight ambient water samples employing the method or methods they routinely use for water quality monitoring. Verification analyses also were conducted on a subset of wells from the CS analysis to confirm or exclude the presence of the target organism. Enterococci results were generally comparable across methods. Confirmation revealed a 9% false positive rate and a 4% false negative rate in the CS method for enterococci, though these errors were small in the context of within- and among-laboratory variability. Fecal coliforms also were comparable across all methods, though CS underestimated the other methods by about 10%, probably because it measures only E. coli, rather than the larger fecal coliform group measured by MF and MTF. CS overestimated total coliforms relative to the other methods by several fold and was found to have a 40% false positive rate in verification. Across-laboratory variability was small relative to within- and among-method variability, but only after data entry errors were corrected. One fifth of the laboratories committed data entry errors that were much larger than any method-related errors. These errors are particularly significant because these data were submitted in a test situation where laboratories were aware they would be under increased scrutiny. Under normal circumstances, it is unlikely that these errors would have been detected and managers would have been obliged to issue beach water quality warnings.
引用
收藏
页码:335 / 344
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison and verification of bacterial water quality indicator measurement methods using ambient coastal water samples
    Griffith, John F.
    Aumand, Larissa A.
    Lee, Ioannice M.
    McGee, Charles D.
    Othman, Laila L.
    Ritter, Kerry J.
    Walker, Kathy O.
    Weisberg, Stephen B.
    ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT, 2006, 116 (1-3) : 335 - 344
  • [2] Comparison of beach bacterial water quality indicator measurement methods
    Noble, RT
    Weisberg, SB
    Leecaster, MK
    McGee, CD
    Ritter, K
    Walker, KO
    Vainik, PM
    ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT, 2003, 81 (1-3) : 301 - 312
  • [3] Comparison of Beach Bacterial Water Quality Indicator Measurement Methods
    Rachel T. Noble
    Stephen B. Weisberg
    Molly K. Leecaster
    Charles D. McGee
    Kerry Ritter
    Kathy O. Walker
    Patricia M. Vainik
    Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2003, 81 : 301 - 312
  • [4] Bacterial markers as tools for coastal water environmental quality measurement
    Herrera, A
    Suárez, P
    INTERCIENCIA, 2005, 30 (03) : 171 - 176
  • [5] A comparison of water quality indices for coastal water
    Gupta, AK
    Gupta, SK
    Patil, RS
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND HEALTH PART A-TOXIC/HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES & ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 2003, 38 (11): : 2711 - 2725
  • [6] SALMONELLAE AND BACTERIAL INDICATOR ORGANISMS IN POLLUTED COASTAL WATER
    YOSHPEPU.Y
    SHUVAL, HI
    ISRAEL JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH, 1971, 21 (02): : 90 - &
  • [7] Comparison of Bacterial Communities in Sands and Water at Beaches with Bacterial Water Quality Violations
    Halliday, Elizabeth
    McLellan, Sandra L.
    Amaral-Zettler, Linda A.
    Sogin, Mitchell L.
    Gast, Rebecca J.
    PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (03):
  • [8] Comparison of bacterial indicator analysis methods in stormwater-affected coastal waters
    Noble, RT
    Leecaster, MK
    McGee, CD
    Weisberg, SB
    Ritter, K
    WATER RESEARCH, 2004, 38 (05) : 1183 - 1188
  • [9] Evaluating Surface Water Quality in a Coastal Province of Vietnamese Mekong Delta Using Water Quality Index and Statistical Methods
    Giao, Nguyen Thanh
    Ly, Nguyen Hong Thao
    POLISH JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES, 2023, 32 (03): : 2113 - 2124
  • [10] Inland and coastal water quality '93 - measurement and modelling
    Environment International, 21 (02):