On the constitutive modeling of a powder metallurgy nanoquasicrystalline Al93Fe3Cr2Ti2 alloy at elevated temperatures

被引:0
作者
Abdallah Shokry
机构
[1] Fayoum University,Department of Mechanical Engineering
来源
Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering | 2019年 / 41卷
关键词
Constitutive modeling; Nanoquasicrystalline ; alloy; Flow stress; Elevated temperatures;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The flow behavior of nanoquasicrystalline Al93Fe3Cr2Ti2\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\hbox {Al}_{93}\hbox {Fe}_{3}\hbox {Cr}_{2}\hbox {Ti}_{2}$$\end{document} alloy at different strain rates and elevated temperatures was represented by the Johnson–Cook model, a modified Johnson–Cook model, a newly modified Johnson–Cook model, and a modified Zerilli–Armstrong model. A comparative study on the capability of the four models to accurately predict the flow stress of the alloy at hot deformations is made using standard statistical parameters correlation coefficient (R) and average absolute relative error (AARE). The results show that the newly modified Johnson–Cook model provides predicted stresses that agree very well with the experimental stresses at the tested domain of strain rates and temperatures, with R = 0.979 and AARE = 7.78%. The modified Zerilli–Armstrong model might predict the flow stress of the alloy but at some of the tested domain of strain rates and temperatures, with R = 0.951 and AARE =  9.13%. The Johnson–Cook model and the modified Johnson–Cook model are found to be inadequate to predict the flow stress of the alloy with R of 0.924 and 0.935 and AARE of 12.72% and 10.73%, respectively.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 107 条
[1]  
Todd I(2004)The influence of processing variables on the structure and mechanical properties of nano-quasicrystalline reinforced aluminium alloys Mater Sci Eng A 375 1235-undefined
[2]  
Chlup Z(2007)Thermal evolution of nanoquasicrystalline J Alloys Compd 434 215-undefined
[3]  
O’Dwyer JG(2000) alloy Mater Sci Eng A 286 1-undefined
[4]  
Lieblich M(2017)High-strength aluminum alloys containing nanoquasicrystalline particles Mater Sci Eng A 705 352-undefined
[5]  
Garci’a-Escorial A(2012)Elevated temperature mechanical behaviour of nanoquasicrystalline Int J Adv Manuf Technol 60 101-undefined
[6]  
Escorial AG(2011) alloy and composites J Mater Process Technol 211 650-undefined
[7]  
Cremaschi V(2009)Numerical simulation and metal flow analysis of hot extrusion process for a complex hollow aluminum profile J Mater Process Technol 209 876-undefined
[8]  
Natale E(2014)Optimisation of flow balance and isothermal extrusion of aluminium using finite-element simulations Mater Des 60 274-undefined
[9]  
Lieblich M(2016)Thermomechanical modeling and simulation of aluminum alloy behavior during extrusion and cooling J Mater Proc Technol 237 31-undefined
[10]  
Inoue A(2017)Influence of the process setup on the microstructure and mechanical properties evolution in porthole die extrusion J Mater Proc Technol 247 214-undefined