The Effect of Numeric Format on Probability Discounting Rates of Medical and Monetary Outcomes

被引:0
作者
Geraldine Smieszhala
Anne C. Macaskill
Maree J. Hunt
机构
[1] Victoria University of Wellington,
来源
The Psychological Record | 2020年 / 70卷
关键词
Probability discounting; Choice decision making; Medical decision making; Informed decision making; Hyperbolic model; Hyperboloid model;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
We assessed whether numeric format in the form of frequencies and percentages affects probability discounting rates in medical and monetary contexts across three experiments. Experiments 1 and 2 compared percentage (e.g., 10%) and frequency (e.g., 10 in 100) formats. Numeric format only affected discounting rates in the medical condition in Experiment 2. The lack of effect of numeric format on probability discounting of money was inconsistent with previous findings from Yi and Bickel (2005). Therefore, in Experiment 3 we more closely replicated their procedure. Results yielded no effect of numeric format on discounting rates. Across experiments, we concluded that probability discounting rates for monetary outcomes are not affected by whether they are presented in a frequency or percentage format. We also concluded that the effect of numeric format on probability discounting rates of medical outcomes is fragile, and unlikely to affect medical decision making in practice. Experiment 2 and 3 also examined whether the hyperbolic or hyperboloid model provided a more efficient description of probability discounting functions. Data were more efficiently described by the hyperbolic model in Experiment 2, and the hyperboloid model in Experiment 3.
引用
收藏
页码:147 / 162
页数:15
相关论文
共 134 条
[1]  
Aczel B(2018)The effect of transparency on framing effects in within-subject designs Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 31 25-39
[2]  
Szollosi A(2017)Probability discounting and cardiovascular risk: The effect of side-effect severity and framing The Psychological Record 67 169-179
[3]  
Bago B(2009)Test–retest reliability of a group-administered paper–pencil measure of delay discounting Experimental & Clinical Psychopharmacology 17 345-355
[4]  
Asgarova R(2017)The value of clean air: Comparing discounting of delayed air quality and money across magnitudes The Psychological Record 67 137-148
[5]  
Macaskill AC(2017)Physical and cognitive effort discounting across different reward magnitudes: Tests of discounting models PLoS ONE 12 e0182353-403
[6]  
Robinson BJ(1990)Inclusion illusions: Fuzzy-trace theory and perceptual salience effects in cognitive development Developmental Review 10 365-288
[7]  
Hunt MJ(2006)Health professionals’ and service users’ interpretation of screening test results: Experimental study British Medical Journal 333 284-309
[8]  
Beck RC(2016)Being kind to your future self: Probability discounting of health decision-making Annals of Behavioral Medicine 50 297-81
[9]  
Triplett MF(2016)Conducting clinical research using crowdsources convenience samples Annual Review of Clinical Psychology 12 53-77
[10]  
Berry MS(2005)Reconciling population benefits and women’s individual autonomy in mammographic screening: In depth interviews to explore women’s views about “informed choice” Australian & New Zealand Journal of Public Health 29 69-492