Impact of DNA extraction efficiency on the sensitivity of PCR-based plant disease diagnosis and pathogen quantification

被引:0
作者
Yalong Yang
Qixing Zhou
Kher Zahr
Michael W. Harding
David Feindel
Jie Feng
机构
[1] Alberta Agriculture and Forestry,The Alberta Plant Health Laboratory
[2] Alberta Agriculture and Forestry,Crop Diversification Centre South
来源
European Journal of Plant Pathology | 2021年 / 159卷
关键词
PCR; qPCR; Clubroot;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
PCR and qPCR are important methods for plant disease diagnosis and quantification of pathogen populations in host tissues or soil. For most plant diseases, DNA extracted from infected tissue or soil is a prerequisite for PCR or qPCR. The efficiency of DNA extraction should have a direct impact on the sensitivity of PCR and qPCR systems. In this study, plant pathogen DNA extraction efficiencies were evaluated based on three plant disease systems and three DNA extraction methods. DNA of bacterial (Pectobacterium atrosepticum), protist (Plasmodiophora brassicae) and fungal (Botrytis cinerea) pathogens was extracted and aliquots were prepared. Aliquots of the DNA were mixed with healthy tissues of the corresponding host plant and DNA was extracted again from the mixture. The resultant mixed DNA, as well as the original pathogen DNA, were analysed by qPCR to assess the quantities of the pathogen DNA. Extraction efficiency was calculated based on the qPCR Cq values of the mixed DNA and the original pathogen DNA for each extraction method on each pathogen. Our results indicated the pathogen DNA extraction efficiencies were generally less than, or near, 50%. This result called attention to the importance of: 1) including the DNA extraction efficiency in the evaluation and announcement of new qPCR diagnostic systems, and 2) developing and using high efficient DNA extraction methods in plant disease diagnosis and pathogen quantification.
引用
收藏
页码:583 / 591
页数:8
相关论文
共 91 条
[1]  
Abdullah AS(2018)Real-time PCR for diagnosing and quantifying co-infection by two globally distributed fungal pathogens of wheat Frontiers in Plant Science 9 1086-401
[2]  
Turo C(2009)Deep sequencing analysis of RNAs from a grapevine showing Syrah decline symptoms reveals a multiple virus infection that includes a novel virus Virology 387 395-1922
[3]  
Moffat CS(2019)Detection and quantification of the 16SrIV-D phytoplasma in leaf tissue of common ornamental palm species in Florida using qPCR and dPCR Plant Disease 103 1918-526
[4]  
Lopez-Ruiz FJ(2018)A rapid diagnostic for detection of Plant Disease 102 519-622
[5]  
Gibberd MR(2009) and Clinical Chemistry 55 611-163
[6]  
Hamblin J(2010) based on real-time PCR Virology 400 157-6528
[7]  
Zerihun A(2014)The MIQE guidelines: Minimum information for publication of quantitative real-time PCR experiments Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry 406 6513-120
[8]  
Al Rwahnih M(2014)Deep-sequencing analysis of viruses infecting grapevines: Viome of a vineyard PLoS One 9 116-276
[9]  
Daubert S(2020)Optimising droplet digital PCR analysis approaches for detection and quantification of bacteria: A case study of fire blight and potato brown rot Plant Disease 104 264-1288
[10]  
Golino D(2014)Development and evaluation of a novel and rapid detection assay for Plant Pathology 63 1282-e00218