Rating the methodological quality in systematic reviews of studies on measurement properties: a scoring system for the COSMIN checklist

[1] Mokkink LB(2009)Evaluation of the methodological quality of systematic reviews of health status measurement instruments Quality of Life Research 18 313-333

[2] Terwee CB(2006)Quality of life in older people: A structured review of self-assessed health instruments Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research 6 181-194

[3] Stratford PW(2009)Self-report scales/checklists for the measurement of concussion symptoms: a systematic review British Journal of Sports Medicine 43 i3-i12

[4] Alonso J(2002)Health related quality of life in Parkinson’s disease: A systematic review of disease specific instruments Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry 72 241-248

[5] Patrick DL(2005)Assessment of functional capacity of the musculoskeletal system in the context of work, daily living, and sport: A systematic review Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation 15 253-272

[6] Riphagen I(2010)The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: An international Delphi study Quality of Life Research 19 539-549

[7] Haywood KL(2010)The COSMIN checklist for evaluating the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties: A clarification of its content BMC Medical Research Methodeology 10 22-1218

[8] Garratt AM(2005)Are factor analytical techniques appropriately used in the validation of health status questionnaires? A systematic review on the quality of factor analyses of the SF-36 Quality of Life Research 14 1203-926

[9] Fitzpatrick R(2008)GRADE: An emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations British Medical Journal 336 924-1941

[10] Alla S(2009)2009 updated method guidelines for systematic reviews in the Cochrane Back Review Group Spine (Phila Pa 34 1929-272

[1] Mokkink LB(2009)Evaluation of the methodological quality of systematic reviews of health status measurement instruments Quality of Life Research 18 313-333

[2] Terwee CB(2006)Quality of life in older people: A structured review of self-assessed health instruments Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research 6 181-194

[3] Stratford PW(2009)Self-report scales/checklists for the measurement of concussion symptoms: a systematic review British Journal of Sports Medicine 43 i3-i12

[4] Alonso J(2002)Health related quality of life in Parkinson’s disease: A systematic review of disease specific instruments Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry 72 241-248

[5] Patrick DL(2005)Assessment of functional capacity of the musculoskeletal system in the context of work, daily living, and sport: A systematic review Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation 15 253-272

[6] Riphagen I(2010)The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: An international Delphi study Quality of Life Research 19 539-549

[7] Haywood KL(2010)The COSMIN checklist for evaluating the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties: A clarification of its content BMC Medical Research Methodeology 10 22-1218

[8] Garratt AM(2005)Are factor analytical techniques appropriately used in the validation of health status questionnaires? A systematic review on the quality of factor analyses of the SF-36 Quality of Life Research 14 1203-926

[9] Fitzpatrick R(2008)GRADE: An emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations British Medical Journal 336 924-1941

[10] Alla S(2009)2009 updated method guidelines for systematic reviews in the Cochrane Back Review Group Spine (Phila Pa 34 1929-272