Bowel wall thickening at CT: Simplifying the diagnosis

被引:86
作者
Fernandes T. [1 ]
Oliveira M.I. [1 ]
Castro R. [1 ]
Araújo B. [1 ]
Viamonte B. [1 ]
Cunha R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Radiology, Hospital de São João, 4200-319 Porto, Alameda Prof. Hernâni Monteiro
关键词
Computed tomography; Inflammatory bowel disease; Small bowel intestinal neoplasms;
D O I
10.1007/s13244-013-0308-y
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: In this article we present a simplified algorithm-based approach to the thickening of the small and large bowel wall detected on routine computed tomography (CT) of the abdomen. Background: Thickening of the small or large bowel wall may be caused by neoplastic, inflammatory, infectious, or ischaemic conditions. First, distinction should be made between focal and segmental or diffuse wall thickening. In cases of focal thickening further analysis of the wall symmetry and perienteric anomalies allows distinguishing between neoplasms and inflammatory conditions. In cases of segmental or diffuse thickening, the pattern of attenuation in light of clinical findings helps narrowing the differential diagnosis. Conclusion: Focal bowel wall thickening may be caused by tumours or inflammatory conditions. Bowel tumours may appear as either regular and symmetric or irregular or asymmetric thickening. When fat stranding is disproportionately more severe than the degree of wall thickening, inflammatory conditions are more likely. With the exception of lymphoma, segmental or diffuse wall thickening is usually caused by benign conditions, such as ischaemic, infectious and inflammatory diseases. Key points: • Thickening of the bowel wall may be focal (<5 cm) and segmental or diffuse (6-40 cm or >40 cm) in extension. • Focal, irregular and asymmetrical thickening of the bowel wall suggests a malignancy. • Perienteric fat stranding disproportionally more severe than the degree of wall thickening suggests an inflammatory condition. • Regular, symmetric and homogeneous wall thickening is more frequently due to benign conditions, but can also be caused by neoplasms such as well-differentiated adenocarcinoma and lymphoma. • Segmental or diffuse bowel wall thickening is usually caused by ischaemic, inflammatory or infectious conditions and the attenuation pattern is helpful in narrowing the differential diagnosis. © 2014 The Author(s).
引用
收藏
页码:195 / 208
页数:13
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [1] Fernandes T.C., Castro R., Pinto D., Oliveira M.I., Carneiro A., Cunha R., Bowel wall thickening - a complex subject made simple, Electronic Poster presented at 2011 ESGAR meeting, (2011)
  • [2] Paulsen S.R., Huprich J.E., Fletcher J.G., Booya F., Young B.M., Fidler J.L., Johnson C.D., Barlow J.M., Earnest F., CT enterography as a diagnostic tool in evaluating small bowel disorders: review of clinical experience with over 700 cases, Radiographics, 26, pp. 641-657, (2006)
  • [3] Macari M., Megibow A.J., Balthazar E.J., A pattern approach to the abnormal small bowel: observations at MDCT and CT enterography, AJR Am J Roentgenol, 188, pp. 1344-1355, (2007)
  • [4] Macari M., Balthazar E.J., CT of bowel wall thickening: significance and pitfalls of interpretation, AJR Am J Roentgenol, 176, pp. 1105-1116, (2001)
  • [5] Wisner W., Khurana B., Ji H., Ros P.R., CT of acute bowel ischemia, Radiology, 226, pp. 635-650, (2003)
  • [6] Wittenberg J., Harisinghani M.G., Jhaveri K., Varghese J., Mueller P.R., Algorithmic approach to CT diagnosis of the abnormal bowel wall, Radiographics, 22, pp. 1093-1107, (2002)
  • [7] Horton K.M., Corl F.M., Fishman E.K., CT evaluation of the colon: inflammatory disease, Radiographics, 20, pp. 399-418, (2000)
  • [8] Fisher J.K., Abnormal colonic wall thickening on computed tomography, J Comput Assist Tomogr, 7, pp. 90-97, (1983)
  • [9] Desai R.K., Tagliabue J.R., Wegryn S.A., Einstein D.M., CT evaluation of wall thickening in the alimentary tract, Radiographics, 11, pp. 771-783, (1991)
  • [10] Chou C.K., Wu R.H., Mak C.W., Lin M.P., Clinical significance of poor CT enhancement of the thickened small-bowel wall in patients with acute abdominal pain, AJR Am J Roentgenol, 186, 2, pp. 491-498, (2006)