The trade network of the Belt and Road Initiative and its topological relationship to the global trade network

被引:0
作者
Zhouying Song
Shuyun Che
Yu Yang
机构
[1] CAS,Key Laboratory of Regional Sustainable Development Modeling
[2] CAS,Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research
[3] University of Chinese Academy of Sciences,College of Resources and Environment
来源
Journal of Geographical Sciences | 2018年 / 28卷
关键词
Belt and Road Initiative; global trade network; trade community; topological relationship;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Unimpeded trade is one of the cooperation priorities in the Belt and Road Initiative proposed by China. On 15 May 2017, the Joint Communique of the Leaders Roundtable of the Belt and Road Forum for International Cooperation reaffirmed the participants’ shared commitment to build an open economy and ensure free and inclusive trade. The Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) is not only China's new action to drive its open and global development, but also a platform for an increasing number of countries to explore free and inclusive trade and promote a universal, rule-based, open, non-discriminatory, and equitable multilateral trade system. It is therefore important to examine the topological relationship between the BRI and global trade networks. More specifically, this article first analyzes the community structure of trade networks using a community detection algorithm, and then estimates the topological relationship between different trade communities. The findings of this article are as follows. First, this research identified three trade communities and two sub-communities in the BRI trade network, in which China is the core, Russia is the sub-core of the biggest trade community, and India, United Arab Emirates, and Saudi Arabia are cores of the second trade community (South Asia-West Asia). Second, it identified five trade communities in the global trade network, centred on China, USA, Russia, India-United Arab Emirates, and Germany- Netherlands-France-Britain and other European developed countries. Third, the topological analysis indicated that in the global trade network, most BRI countries are attracted by the core nodes of the BRI regions, such as the China, Russia and India-United Arab Emirates core nodes, and have strong trade contacts with BRI countries. Most Central-East European countries are mainly attracted by Germany-Netherlands-France-Britain and other developed European countries with a low penetration of BRI trade. Although some Southeast Asian countries are incorporated into the Asia-Australia-South Africa community with China as the core, they still need to strengthen trade linkages with BRI countries.
引用
收藏
页码:1249 / 1262
页数:13
相关论文
共 53 条
  • [1] Blondel V(2008)Fast unfolding of communities in large networks Journal of Statistical Mechanics Theory 25 155-168
  • [2] Guillaume J(2015)Are preferential agreements significant for the world trade structure? A network community analysis Kyklos 68 220-239
  • [3] Lambiotte R(2011)Analysis on social network of world trade situation in 2000–2009 Journal of International Trade 11 31-42
  • [4] Carolo P(2016)Estimating Chinese trade relationships with the Silk Road countries China & World Economy 24 5-103
  • [5] Lucia T(2008)Topological structure evolution of world trade network Systems Engineering: Theory & Practice 10 71-75
  • [6] Chen Y F(2010)The evolution of the world trade web: A weighted-network analysis Journal of Evolutionary Economics 20 479-514
  • [7] Cinar M(2015)Commodity structure of trade between China and countries in the Belt and Road Initiative area Progress in Geography 34 571-580
  • [8] Johnson J(2012)Markets and networks in international trade: On the role of distances in globalization Management International Review 52 761-789
  • [9] Geusz K(2016)Analysis on competitiveness and complementarity of agricultural products tradein countries along “Belt and Road Initiative” areas Issues in Agricultural Economy 11 51-60
  • [10] Duan W Q(2018)Critical transformations and global development: Materials for a new analytical framework Area Development and Policy 3 1-23