A phase II study of conventional radiation therapy and thalidomide for supratentorial, newly-diagnosed glioblastoma (RTOG 9806)

被引:0
|
作者
Brian M. Alexander
Meihua Wang
W. K. Alfred Yung
Howard A. Fine
Bernadine A. Donahue
Ivo W. Tremont
Ray S. Richards
Kevin J. Kerlin
Alan C. Hartford
Walter J. Curran
Minesh P. Mehta
机构
[1] Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women’s Cancer Center,Neuro
[2] RTOG Statistical Center,Oncology Branch
[3] University of Texas-MD Anderson Cancer Center,undefined
[4] National Cancer Institute,undefined
[5] Maimonides Medical Center,undefined
[6] Intermountain Medical Center,undefined
[7] Southeast Cancer Control Consortium,undefined
[8] Inc.,undefined
[9] CCOP,undefined
[10] Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center,undefined
[11] Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University,undefined
[12] Northwestern Memorial Hospital,undefined
来源
Journal of Neuro-Oncology | 2013年 / 111卷
关键词
Glioblastoma; Clinical trial; Controlled; Radiation therapy; Thalidomide; Angiogenesis inhibitor;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) initiated the single-arm, phase II study 9806 to determine the safety and efficacy of daily thalidomide with radiation therapy in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. Patients were treated with thalidomide (200 mg daily) from day one of radiation therapy, increasing by 100–200 to 1,200 mg every 1–2 weeks until tumor progression or unacceptable toxicity. The median survival time (MST) of all 89 evaluable patients was 10 months. When compared with the historical database stratified by recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) class, this end point was not different [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.18; 95 % CI: 0.95–1.46; P = 0.93]. The MST of RPA class III and IV patients was 13.9 versus 12.5 months in controls (HR = 0.99; 95 % CI: 0.73–1.36; P = 0.48), and 4.3 versus 8.6 months in RPA class V controls (HR = 1.63, 95 % CI: 1.17–2.27; P = 0.99). In all, 34 % of patients discontinued thalidomide because of adverse events or refusal. The most common grade 3–4 toxicities were venous thrombosis, fatigue, skin reactions, encephalopathy, and neuropathy. In conclusion, thalidomide given simultaneously with radiation therapy was safe, but did not improve survival in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma.
引用
收藏
页码:33 / 39
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Are three weeks hypofractionated radiation therapy (HFRT) comparable to six weeks for newly diagnosed glioblastoma patients? Results of a phase II study
    Navarria, Pierina
    Pessina, Federico
    Tomatis, Stefano
    Soffietti, Riccardo
    Grimaldi, Marco
    Lopci, Egesta
    Chiti, Arturo
    Leonetti, Antonella
    Casarotti, Alessandra
    Rossi, Marco
    Cozzi, Luca
    Ascolese, Anna Maria
    Simonelli, Matteo
    Marcheselli, Simona
    Santoro, Armando
    Clerici, Elena
    Bello, Lorenzo
    Scorsetti, Marta
    ONCOTARGET, 2017, 8 (40) : 67696 - 67708
  • [22] Hypofractionated radiation therapy (HFRT) versus conventional fractionated radiation therapy (CRT) for newly diagnosed glioblastoma patients. A propensity score matched analysis
    Navarria, Pierina
    Pessina, Federico
    Franzese, Ciro
    Tomatis, Stefano
    Perrino, Matteo
    Cozzi, Luca
    Simonelli, Matteo
    Bello, Lorenzo
    Clerici, Elena
    Riva, Marco
    Santoro, Armando
    Scorsetti, Marta
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2018, 127 (01) : 108 - 113
  • [23] A phase II study of thalidomide and irinotecan for treatment of glioblastoma multiforme
    Camilo E. Fadul
    Linda S. Kingman
    Louise P. Meyer
    Bernard F. Cole
    Clifford J. Eskey
    C. Harker Rhodes
    David W. Roberts
    Herbert B. Newton
    J. Marc Pipas
    Journal of Neuro-Oncology, 2008, 90
  • [24] Phase II study of Thalidomide in the treatment of recurrent glioblastoma multiforme
    Marx, GM
    Pavlakis, N
    McCowatt, S
    Boyle, FM
    Levi, JA
    Bell, DR
    Cook, R
    Biggs, M
    Little, N
    Wheeler, HR
    JOURNAL OF NEURO-ONCOLOGY, 2001, 54 (01) : 31 - 38
  • [25] Phase II study of Thalidomide in the treatment of recurrent glioblastoma multiforme
    Gavin M. Marx
    Nicholas Pavlakis
    Sally McCowatt
    Frances M. Boyle
    John A. Levi
    David R. Bell
    Raymond Cook
    Michael Biggs
    Nicholas Little
    Helen R. Wheeler
    Journal of Neuro-Oncology, 2001, 54 : 31 - 38
  • [26] A phase II study of thalidomide and irinotecan for treatment of glioblastoma multiforme
    Fadul, Camilo E.
    Kingman, Linda S.
    Meyer, Louise P.
    Cole, Bernard F.
    Eskey, Clifford J.
    Rhodes, C. Harker
    Roberts, David W.
    Newton, Herbert B.
    Pipas, J. Marc
    JOURNAL OF NEURO-ONCOLOGY, 2008, 90 (02) : 229 - 235
  • [27] The impact of the time to start radiation therapy on overall survival in newly diagnosed glioblastoma
    Vanessa Montes Santos
    Gustavo Nader Marta
    Marcella Coelho Mesquita
    Rossana Veronica Mendoza Lopez
    Edla Renata Cavalcante
    Olavo Feher
    Journal of Neuro-Oncology, 2019, 143 : 95 - 100
  • [28] The impact of the time to start radiation therapy on overall survival in newly diagnosed glioblastoma
    Santos, Vanessa Montes
    Marta, Gustavo Nader
    Mesquita, Marcella Coelho
    Mendoza Lopez, Rossana Veronica
    Cavalcante, Edla Renata
    Feher, Olavo
    JOURNAL OF NEURO-ONCOLOGY, 2019, 143 (01) : 95 - 100
  • [29] A phase I/II trial of hydroxychloroquine in conjunction with radiation therapy and concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme
    Rosenfeld, Myrna R.
    Ye, Xiaobu
    Supko, Jeffrey G.
    Desideri, Serena
    Grossman, Stuart A.
    Brem, Steven
    Mikkelson, Tom
    Wang, Daniel
    Chang, Yunyoung C.
    Hu, Janice
    McAfee, Quentin
    Fisher, Joy
    Troxel, Andrea
    Piao, Shengfu
    Heitjan, Daniel F.
    Tan, Kay See
    Pontiggia, Laura
    O'Dwyer, Peter J.
    Davis, Lisa E.
    Amaravadi, Ravi K.
    AUTOPHAGY, 2014, 10 (08) : 1359 - 1368
  • [30] Phase II trial of hypofractionated intensity-modulated radiation therapy combined with temozolomide and bevacizumab for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma
    Douglas E. Ney
    Julie A. Carlson
    Denise M. Damek
    Laurie E. Gaspar
    Brian D. Kavanagh
    B. K. Kleinschmidt-DeMasters
    Allen E. Waziri
    Kevin O. Lillehei
    Krishna Reddy
    Changhu Chen
    Journal of Neuro-Oncology, 2015, 122 : 135 - 143