Online P2P Lending and Regulatory Responses in China: Opportunities and Challenges

被引:0
作者
Robin Hui Huang
机构
[1] Chinese University of Hong Kong,Centre for Financial Regulation and Economic Development, Faculty of Law
[2] University of New South Wales,Faculty of Law
来源
European Business Organization Law Review | 2018年 / 19卷
关键词
Fintech; Internet finance; Online lending; P2P; China;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
As a main form of the Fintech industry, China’s online P2P lending market has undergone a period of explosive growth in the past few years to become the largest in the world, with online lending platforms having mushroomed across the country. This is a consequence of the simultaneous emergence of three key factors, namely deep penetration of internet, large supply of funds and unmet financial needs. The market exhibits several distinctive features in terms of the size of platforms, the level of market concentration and business models. As online lending gathers moment in China, many problems have come into light. China has recently established a relatively complete regulatory regime for online lending, introducing a number of significant changes, such as the restriction on the business model that can be adopted by platforms, registration requirements, custodian requirements, information disclosure requirements and lending limits. The new regime will have far-reaching implications, including a reshuffling of the market and more collaboration between online lending platforms and traditional banks. A comparative analysis of the Chinese experience with those in other jurisdictions such as the US, the UK, Hong Kong and Japan is conducted to examine the extent to which the new regime is likely to achieve a proper balance between its two main objectives, namely facilitating the growth of the online lending market and protecting financial consumers. While the new regime is generally sound, its efficacy will ultimately depend on how it is enforced in practice.
引用
收藏
页码:63 / 92
页数:29
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   Risks of P2P Lending Platforms in China: Modeling Failure Using a Cox Hazard Model [J].
Li, Jianjun ;
Hsu, Sara ;
Chen, Zhang ;
Chen, Yang .
CHINESE ECONOMY, 2016, 49 (03) :161-172
[22]   What Influences the Market Outcome of Online P2P Lending Marketplace? A Cross-Country Analysis [J].
Xu, Yun ;
Luo, Chuan ;
Chen, Dongyu ;
Zheng, Haichao .
JOURNAL OF GLOBAL INFORMATION MANAGEMENT, 2015, 23 (03) :23-40
[23]   Peer to Peer (P2P) Lending Problems and Potential Solutions: A Systematic Literature Review [J].
Suryono, Ryan Randy ;
Purwandari, Betty ;
Budi, Indra .
FIFTH INFORMATION SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE, 2019, 161 :204-214
[24]   Why individuals invested in China's P2P lending market: an explanation based on categorization theory [J].
Liu, Ye ;
Wang, Yufeng ;
Li, Haohua ;
Zhou, Zhi .
APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2025, 57 (04) :448-452
[25]   Proof of Concept of Blockchain Integration in P2P Lending for Developing Countries [J].
Mbodji, Fatou Ndiaye ;
Mendy, Gervais ;
Mbacke, Ahmath Bamba ;
Ouya, Samuel .
E-INFRASTRUCTURE AND E-SERVICES FOR DEVELOPING COUNTRIES (AFRICOMM 2019), 2020, 311 :59-70
[26]   Detection of Defaulters in P2P Lending Platforms using Unsupervised Learning [J].
Mukherjee, Partha ;
Badr, Youakim .
2022 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON OMNI-LAYER INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS (IEEE COINS 2022), 2022, :48-52
[27]   Financial Intermediation in the Age of FinTech: P2P Lending and the Reinvention of Banking [J].
Bavoso, Vincenzo .
OXFORD JOURNAL OF LEGAL STUDIES, 2022, 42 (01) :48-75
[28]   Network Formation and Financial Inclusion in P2P Lending: A Computational Model [J].
Katsamakas, Evangelos ;
Manuel Sanchez-Cartas, J. .
SYSTEMS, 2022, 10 (05)
[29]   A computational model of the effects of borrower default on the stability of P2P lending platforms [J].
Katsamakas, Evangelos ;
Sanchez-Cartas, J. Manuel .
EURASIAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2024, 14 (03) :597-618
[30]   Research on the Influencing Factors of the Development of Green Finance in P2P Lending Platforms [J].
Fu, Jialin ;
Fan, Yantian .
PROCEEDINGS OF INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON GREEN MANAGEMENT AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT'S RESPONSIBILITY, 2017, 2017, :85-90