Online P2P Lending and Regulatory Responses in China: Opportunities and Challenges

被引:0
|
作者
Robin Hui Huang
机构
[1] Chinese University of Hong Kong,Centre for Financial Regulation and Economic Development, Faculty of Law
[2] University of New South Wales,Faculty of Law
来源
European Business Organization Law Review | 2018年 / 19卷
关键词
Fintech; Internet finance; Online lending; P2P; China;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
As a main form of the Fintech industry, China’s online P2P lending market has undergone a period of explosive growth in the past few years to become the largest in the world, with online lending platforms having mushroomed across the country. This is a consequence of the simultaneous emergence of three key factors, namely deep penetration of internet, large supply of funds and unmet financial needs. The market exhibits several distinctive features in terms of the size of platforms, the level of market concentration and business models. As online lending gathers moment in China, many problems have come into light. China has recently established a relatively complete regulatory regime for online lending, introducing a number of significant changes, such as the restriction on the business model that can be adopted by platforms, registration requirements, custodian requirements, information disclosure requirements and lending limits. The new regime will have far-reaching implications, including a reshuffling of the market and more collaboration between online lending platforms and traditional banks. A comparative analysis of the Chinese experience with those in other jurisdictions such as the US, the UK, Hong Kong and Japan is conducted to examine the extent to which the new regime is likely to achieve a proper balance between its two main objectives, namely facilitating the growth of the online lending market and protecting financial consumers. While the new regime is generally sound, its efficacy will ultimately depend on how it is enforced in practice.
引用
收藏
页码:63 / 92
页数:29
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Research on the Factors Affecting the Successful Borrowing Rate of P2P Network Lending in China - Taking the Case of Renrendai Online Lending as An Example
    Guo, Beibei
    2016 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL ECONOMICS SYSTEM AND INDUSTRIAL SECURITY ENGINEERING (IEIS), 2016,
  • [12] Too Much Technology and Too Little Regulation? The Spectacular Demise of P2P Lending in China
    Chen, Ding
    Deakin, Simon
    Johnston, Andrew
    Wang, Boya
    ACCOUNTING ECONOMICS AND LAW-A CONVIVIUM, 2021,
  • [13] P2P lending adoption by SMEs in Indonesia
    Rosavina, Monica
    Rahadi, Raden Aswin
    Kitri, Mandra Lazuardi
    Nuraeni, Shimaditya
    Mayangsari, Lidia
    QUALITATIVE RESEARCH IN FINANCIAL MARKETS, 2019, 11 (02) : 260 - 279
  • [14] Herding behaviour in P2P lending markets
    Caglayan, Mustafa
    Talavera, Oleksandr
    Zhang, Wei
    JOURNAL OF EMPIRICAL FINANCE, 2021, 63 : 27 - 41
  • [15] Message framing in P2P lending relationships
    Huang, Jin
    Sena, Vania
    Li, Jun
    Ozdemir, Sena
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2021, 122 : 761 - 773
  • [16] Developing a P2P lending platform: stages, strategies and platform configurations
    Au, Cheuk Hang
    Tan, Barney
    Sun, Yuan
    INTERNET RESEARCH, 2020, 30 (04) : 1229 - 1249
  • [17] Adverse Selection in P2P Lending: Does Peer Screening Work Efficiently?-Empirical Evidence from a P2P Platform
    Wang, Yao
    Drabek, Zdenek
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 2021, 9 (04):
  • [18] How does P2P lending platform reputation affect lenders' decision in China?
    Shi, Xiaokun
    Wu, Junjie
    Hollingsworth, Jane
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BANK MARKETING, 2019, 37 (07) : 1566 - 1589
  • [19] On emergence in service platforms: An application to P2P lending
    Pena, Maria Veronica Torres
    Breidbach, Christoph F.
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2021, 135 : 337 - 347
  • [20] The bane of P2P lending: credit scoring governance on the ASEAN fintech triumvirate
    Rosdini, Dini
    Wahyuni, Ersa Tri
    Sari, Prima Yusi
    JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY POLICY MANAGEMENT, 2024, 15 (02) : 268 - 287