Selective peroxisome proliferator-activated receptorα modulators (SPPARMα): The next generation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α-agonists

被引:0
作者
Jean-Charles Fruchart
机构
[1] Fondation coeur et arteres,
来源
Cardiovascular Diabetology | / 12卷
关键词
Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor; Fibrate; SPPARM; K-877; Cardiovascular; Diabetes; Metabolic syndrome;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Dyslipidemia is a major risk factor for cardiovascular (CV) disease – the primary cause of death, worldwide. Although reducing levels of low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol can significantly reduce CV risk, a high level of residual risk persists, especially in people with obesity-related conditions, such as metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha- (PPARα-) agonists (e.g. fibrates), play a central role in the reduction of macro- and microvascular risk in these patients. However, the currently available fibrates are weak (PPARα-agonists) with limited efficacy due to dose-related adverse effects. To address this problem, a new generation of highly potent and selective PPARα-modulators (SPPARMα) is being developed that separate the benefits of the PPARα-agonists from their unwanted side effects. Among these, aleglitazar (a dual PPARα/γ agonist) and GFT505 (a dual PPAR α/δ agonist) have recently entered late-phase development. Although both compounds are more potent PPARα-activators than fenofibrate in vitro, only aleglitezar is more effective in lowering triglycerides and raising high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C) in humans. However, it is also associated with a potential risk of adverse effects. More recently, a highly potent, specific PPARα-agonist (K-877) has emerged with SPPARMα characteristics. Compared to fenofibrate, K-877 has more potent PPARα-activating efficacy in vitro, greater effects on triglycerides- and HDL-C levels in humans, and a reduced risk of adverse effects. If successful, K-877 has the potential to supersede the fibrates as the treatment of choice for patients with residual CV risk associated with metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 391 条
[1]  
Baigent C(2010)Efficacy and safety of more intensive lowering of LDL cholesterol: a meta-analysis of data from 170,000 participants in 26 randomised trials Lancet 376 1670-1681
[2]  
Blackwell L(2005)Efficacy and safety of cholesterol-lowering treatment: prospective meta-analysis of data from 90 056 participants in 14 randomised trials of statins Lancet 366 1267-1278
[3]  
Emberson J(2008)Efficacy of cholesterol-lowering therapy in 18,686 people with diabetes in 14 randomised trials of statins: a meta-analysis Lancet 371 117-125
[4]  
Holland LE(2003)Multifactorial intervention and cardiovascular disease in patients with type 2 diabetes N Engl J Med 348 383-393
[5]  
Reith C(2009)Major lipids, apolipoproteins, and risk of vascular disease JAMA 302 1993-2000
[6]  
Bhala N(2011)The REALIST (REsiduAl risk, LIpids and Standard Therapies) study: an analysis of residual risk attributable to lipid profile in acute coronary syndrome Endocrinol Nutr 58 38-47
[7]  
Peto R(2010)Contribution of high plasma triglycerides and low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol to residual risk of coronary heart disease after establishment of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol control Am J Cardiol 106 757-763
[8]  
Barnes EH(2012)European guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice 2012: The Fifth Joint Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and other societies on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice Eur Heart J 33 1635-1701
[9]  
Keech A(2011)Triglyceride-rich lipoproteins and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol in patients at high risk of cardiovascular disease: evidence and guidance for management Eur Heart J 32 1345-1361
[10]  
Simes J(2005)Effects of long-term fenofibrate therapy on cardiovascular events in 9795 people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (the FIELD study): randomised controlled trial Lancet 366 1849-1861