An overview of the Energy Modeling Forum 33rd study: assessing large-scale global bioenergy deployment for managing climate change

被引:0
作者
Steven K Rose
Nico Bauer
Alexander Popp
John Weyant
Shinichiro Fujimori
Petr Havlik
Marshall Wise
Detlef P van Vuuren
机构
[1] Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI),Energy Systems and Climate Analysis Research Group
[2] Leibniz Association,Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research
[3] Stanford University,Department of Environmental Engineering
[4] Kyoto University,Center for Social and Environmental Systems Research
[5] National Institute for Environmental Studies,Joint Global Change Research Institute
[6] International Institute for Applied System Analysis,Copernicus Institute of Sustainable Development
[7] Pacific Northwest National Laboratory & Univ. of Maryland,undefined
[8] PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency,undefined
[9] Utrecht University,undefined
来源
Climatic Change | 2020年 / 163卷
关键词
Biomass; Bioenergy; Decarbonization; Climate change; Emissions scenarios;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Previous studies have projected a significant role for bioenergy in decarbonizing the global economy and helping realize international climate goals such as limiting global average warming to 2 ˚C or 1.5 ˚C. However, with substantial variability in bioenergy results and significant concerns about potential environmental and social implications, greater transparency and dedicated assessment of the underlying modeling and results and more detailed understanding of the potential role of bioenergy are needed. Stanford University’s Energy Modeling Forum (EMF) initiated a 33rd study (EMF-33) to explore the viability of large-scale bioenergy as part of a comprehensive climate management strategy. This special issue presents the papers of the EMF-33 study—a multi-year inter-model comparison project designed to understand and assess global, long-run biomass supply and bioenergy deployment potentials and related uncertainties. Using a novel scenario design with independent biomass supply and bioenergy demand protocols, EMF-33 separately elucidates and explores the modeling of biomass feedstock supplies and bioenergy technologies and their deployment—revealing, comparing, and assessing the modeling that is suggesting that bioenergy could be a key climate containment strategy. This introduction provides an overview of the EMF-33 study design and the overview, thematic, and individual modeling team papers and types of insights that make up this special issue. By providing enhanced transparency and new detailed insights, we hope to inform policy dialogue about the potential role of bioenergy and facilitate new research.
引用
收藏
页码:1539 / 1551
页数:12
相关论文
共 103 条
[1]  
Creutzig F(2013)Integrating place-specific livelihood and equity outcomes into global assessments of bioenergy deployment Environ Res Lett 8 035047-944
[2]  
Corbera E(2015)Bioenergy and climate change mitigation: an assessment GCB Bioenergy 7 916-934
[3]  
Bolwig S(2020)Progress and barriers in understanding and preventing indirect land-use change Biofuels Bioprod Biorefin 14 924-7
[4]  
Hunsberger C(2015)Negative emissions physically needed to keep global warming below 2°C Nat Commun 6 1-13299
[5]  
Creutzig F(2018)Bioenergy cropland expansion may offset positive effects of climate change mitigation for global vertebrate diversity Proc Natl Acad Sci 115 13294-509
[6]  
Ravindranath NH(2018)Large-scale bioenergy production: how to resolve sustainability trade-offs? Environ Res Lett 13 024011-332
[7]  
Berndes G(2014)Land-use transition for bioenergy and climate stabilization: model comparison of drivers, impacts and interactions with other land use based mitigation options Clim Chang 123 495-493
[8]  
Bolwig S(2018)Scenarios towards limiting global mean temperature increase below 1.5 °C Nat Clim Chang 8 325-undefined
[9]  
Bright R(2014)Bioenergy in energy transformation and climate management Clim Chang 123 477-undefined
[10]  
Cherubini F(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined