Prevalence and determinants of osteoporosis among men aged 50 years or more in Sri Lanka: A community-based cross-sectional study

被引:0
作者
Lekamwasam S. [1 ]
Wijayaratne L. [2 ]
Rodrigo M. [3 ]
Hewage U. [4 ]
机构
[1] Faculty of Medicine, Center for Metabolic Bone Diseases
[2] Department of Rheumatology, National Hospital, Colombo
[3] Faculty of Medicine, Department of Anatomy, Galle
[4] Department of Medicine, Mount Isa Hospital, QLD
关键词
AccuDXA; Cross-sectional study; Male osteoporosis; Sri Lanka;
D O I
10.1007/s11657-009-0032-x
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This study, based on phalangeal bone mineral density (BMD) of 1,174 community dwelling male volunteers aged 50 years or more from seven provinces in Sri Lanka, shows 5.8% prevalence of osteoporosis among them. Advancing age, less physical activity, and low body weight were associated with low BMD. Men with larger families were more likely to have a lower bone mineral density. Purpose: The prevalence of osteoporosis among Sri Lankans is not well-known. We wished to estimate the prevalence and determinants of osteoporosis among older men in Sri Lanka. Methods: One thousand one hundred seventy-four healthy, community dwelling male volunteers, aged 50 years or more from seven out of nine provinces in Sri Lanka underwent phalangeal bone mineral density estimation using an AccuDXA® scanner. We calculated T scores using the local reference data, and subjects with T score equal or less than -2.5 was considered to have osteoporosis. Results: Sixty-six men (5.8%) were detected to have osteoporosis. In contrast to men in the highest tertile of bone mineral density, men in the lowest tertile were older (60.0 versus 55.8 years, p<0.001), lighter (56.3 versus 65.6 kg, p<0.001), less physically active (16.1% versus 5.5%, p<0.001) and had larger families consisting of four or more children (36% versus 20.9%, p<0.001). Smoking, alcohol, or milk consumption showed no association with bone mineral density. Conclusions: We report 5.8% prevalence of osteoporosis among men older than 50 years in Sri Lanka, and advancing age, less physical activity, and low body weight were associated with low bone mineral density. Men with larger families were more likely to have a lower bone mineral density.
引用
收藏
页码:79 / 84
页数:5
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
Seeman E., The dilemma of osteoporosis in men, Am J Med, 98, (1995)
[2]  
Kanis J.A., Oden A., Johnell O., De Laet C., Jonsson B., Oglesby A.K., The components of excess mortality after hip fracture, Bone, 32, 5, pp. 468-473, (2003)
[3]  
Center J.R., Nguyen T.V., Schneider D., Sambrook P.N., Eisman J.A., Mortality after all major types of osteoporotic fracture in men and women: An observational study, Lancet, 353, 9156, pp. 878-882, (1999)
[4]  
Kanis J.A., Johnell O., Oden A., De Laet C., Mellstrom D., Epidemiology of osteoporosis and fracture in men, Calcified Tissue International, 75, 2, pp. 90-99, (2004)
[5]  
Van Der Klift M., De Laet C.E.D.H., McCloskey E.V., Hofman A., Pols H.A.P., The incidence of vertebral fractures in men and women: The Rotterdam study, Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, 17, 6, pp. 1051-1056, (2002)
[6]  
Kanis J.A., Melton III L.J., Christiansen C., Johnston C.C., Khaltaev N., The diagnosis of osteoporosis, J Bone Miner Res, 9, pp. 1137-1141, (1994)
[7]  
Looker A.C., Orwoll E.S., Johnston Jr C.C., Lindsay R.L., Wahner H.W., Dunn W.L., Calvo M.S., Harris T.B., Heyse S.P., Prevalence of low femoral bone density in older U.S. adults from NHANES III, J Bone Miner Res, 12, pp. 1761-1768, (1997)
[8]  
Faulkner K.G., Orwoll E., Implications in the use of T-scores for the diagnosis of osteoporosis in men, J Clin Densitom, 5, pp. 87-93, (2002)
[9]  
Binkley N.C., Schmeer P., Wasnich R.D., Lenchik L., What are the criteria by which a densitometric diagnosis of osteoporosis can be made in males and non-caucasians?, Journal of Clinical Densitometry, 5, SUPPL., (2002)
[10]  
Mulder J.E., Michaeli D., Flaster E.R., Siris E., Comparison of bone mineral density of the phalanges, lumbar spine, hip, and forearm for assessment of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women, Journal of Clinical Densitometry, 3, 4, pp. 373-381, (2000)