Development dynamics: Pre and Post Brexit analysis of United Kingdom

被引:0
作者
Jawad M. [1 ]
Maroof Z. [2 ]
Naz M. [3 ]
机构
[1] Department of Economics, University of York, York
[2] Department of Leadership and Management Studies, National Defence University, Islamabad
[3] Department of Mathematics, University of York, York
关键词
Brexit; Capital account openness; Chinn ito index; Equity openness; Industrial development; Trade openness;
D O I
10.1007/s11135-018-0789-3
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The main prospective of this research is to analysis the industrial development (IDV) nexus for a sample of Pre Brexit Polling and After Brexit Polling in the economy of United Kingdom. The prevalence of structural, political and institutional instabilities in the region under study makes it important to study from a policy perspective. The specific objective of the current study is to check the nature of relationship between capital account openness, trade openness, equity openness and IDV for Pre Brexit Polling and After Brexit Polling in United Kingdom. The current study utilized time series data set for Pre-Brexit analysis data from May 1, 2014 to June 23, 2016 and Post-Brexit analysis data from June 24, 2016 to May 1, 2018. Initially multiple regression methods was applied and in next step VAR, Impulse response function and Variance decomposition has been applied for describing shocks, quantifying shocks and explaining intra and inter dependencies respectively. Results showed that Financial openness policies and macroeconomic policies should be totally reformulated and redesigned as the previously followed policies does not contributed in IDV in Pre Brexit Polling and Post Brexit Polling in United Kingdom. © 2018, Springer Nature B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:791 / 811
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Factors influencing content credibility in Facebook’s news feedInside view on the United Kingdom (UK) Post-Brexit
    Sonia Sousa
    Neil Bates
    Human-Intelligent Systems Integration, 2021, 3 (1) : 69 - 78
  • [42] The Brexit effect: Political implications of the exit of the United Kingdom from the European Union
    Baldini, Gianfranco
    Chelotti, Nicola
    INTERNATIONAL POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 2022, 43 (03) : 319 - 328
  • [43] Policy or Partisanship in the United Kingdom? Quasi-Experimental Evidence from Brexit
    Schonfeld, Bryan
    Winter-Levy, Sam
    JOURNAL OF POLITICS, 2021, 83 (04) : 1450 - 1461
  • [44] The Impact of Brexit on the Pharmaceutical Supply Chain of the United Kingdom: Scoping Review Protocol
    Milne-Ives, Madison
    Lam, Ching
    van Velthoven, Michelle
    Meinert, Edward
    JMIR RESEARCH PROTOCOLS, 2020, 9 (09):
  • [45] Brexit and United Kingdom citizens with HIV residing in Spain: a matter of public health
    McHale, Jean V.
    Ramiro Aviles, Miguel A.
    AIDS, 2019, 33 (14) : 2257 - 2259
  • [46] Towards managing the United Kingdom's fisheries: A Brexit view from Scotland
    Forse, Andy
    Drakeford, Benjamin
    Potts, Jonathan
    MARINE POLICY, 2019, 109
  • [47] Health "Brexternalities": The Brexit Effect on Health and Health Care outside the United Kingdom
    Hervey, Tamara
    Antova, Ivanka
    Flear, Mark L.
    McHale, Jean, V
    Speakman, Elizabeth
    Wood, Matthew
    JOURNAL OF HEALTH POLITICS POLICY AND LAW, 2021, 46 (01) : 177 - 203
  • [48] Spanish nationals in the United Kingdom. The Impact of Brexit: Flows, Consequences and Narratives
    Chao, Luca
    Alejo, Antonio
    Giner-Monfort, Jordi
    PAPERS-REVISTA DE SOCIOLOGIA, 2024, 109 (04):
  • [49] Brexit and European doctors’ decisions to leave the United Kingdom: a qualitative analysis of free-text questionnaire comments
    Adrienne Milner
    Rebecca Nielsen
    Emma Norris
    BMC Health Services Research, 21
  • [50] The emotional consequences of novel political identities: Brexit and mental health in the United Kingdom
    Bentall, Richard P.
    Alsuhibani, Azzam
    Bennett, Kate
    Braddick, Michael
    Butter, Sarah
    Hyland, Philip
    McBride, Orla
    McKay, Ryan
    Shevlin, Mark
    Stocks, Thomas V. A.
    Hartman, Todd K.
    POLITICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2024, 45 (01) : 133 - 149