Alignment of genetic maps and QTLs between inter- and intra-specific sorghum populations

被引:0
|
作者
F. A. Feltus
G. E. Hart
K. F. Schertz
A. M. Casa
S. Kresovich
S. Abraham
P. E. Klein
P. J. Brown
A. H. Paterson
机构
[1] University of Georgia,Plant Genome Mapping Laboratory
[2] Texas A & M University,Department of Soil and Crop Sciences
[3] United States Department of Agriculture,Institute for Genomic Diversity and Department of Plant Breeding
[4] Cornell University,Institute for Plant Genomics and Biotechnology
[5] Rubber Research Institute of India,undefined
[6] Texas A & M University,undefined
来源
关键词
Quantitative Trait Locus; Sorghum; Leaf Length; Kernel Weight; Tiller Number;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
To increase the value of associated molecular tools and also to begin to explore the degree to which interspecific and intraspecific genetic variation in Sorghum is attributable to corresponding genetic loci, we have aligned genetic maps derived from two sorghum populations that share one common parent (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench accession BTx623) but differ in morphological and evolutionarily distant alternate parents (S. propinquum or S. bicolor accession IS3620C). A total of 106 well-distributed DNA markers provide for map alignment, revealing only six nominal differences in marker order that are readily explained by sampling variation or mapping of paralogous loci. We also report a total of 61 new QTLs detected from 17 traits in these crosses. Among eight corresponding traits (some new, some previously published) that could be directly compared between the two maps, QTLs for two (tiller height and tiller number) were found to correspond in a non-random manner (P<0.05). For several other traits, correspondence of subsets of QTLs narrowly missed statistical significance. In particular, several QTLs for leaf senescence were near loci previously mapped for ‘stay-green’ that have been implicated by others in drought tolerance. These data provide strong validation for the value of molecular tools developed in the interspecific cross for utilization in cultivated sorghum, and begin to separate QTLs that distinguish among Sorghum species from those that are informative within the cultigen (S. bicolor).
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Inter- and intra-specific scaling of articular surface areas in the hominoid talus
    Parr, William C. H.
    Chatterjee, Helen J.
    Soligo, Christophe
    JOURNAL OF ANATOMY, 2011, 218 (04) : 386 - 401
  • [22] Inter- and intra-specific variation in hair cortisol concentrations of Neotropical bats
    Sandoval-Herrera, Natalia, I
    Mastromonaco, Gabriela F.
    Becker, Daniel J.
    Simmons, Nancy B.
    Welch, Kenneth C.
    CONSERVATION PHYSIOLOGY, 2021, 9
  • [23] Inter- and Intra-specific Differences in the Response of Chinese Leafy Vegetables to Ozone
    Zhao, Yuechun
    Bell, J. Nigel B.
    Wahid, Abdul
    Power, Sally A.
    WATER AIR AND SOIL POLLUTION, 2011, 216 (1-4): : 451 - 462
  • [24] INTER- AND INTRA-SPECIFIC DIFFERENCES IN ROOT RESPIRATION RATES OF 4 HARDWOOD SPECIES
    STEINBECK, K
    MCALPINE, RG
    FOREST SCIENCE, 1966, 12 (04) : 473 - +
  • [25] Apomictic seed formation from inter- and intra-specific crosses of Diospyros lotus
    Ikeda, K
    Sugiura, A
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2ND INTERNATIONAL PERSIMMON SYMPOSIUM, 2003, (601): : 209 - 211
  • [26] Honey bees and bumble bees respond differently to inter- and intra-specific encounters
    Rogers, Shelley R.
    Cajamarca, Peter
    Tarpy, David R.
    Burrack, Hannah J.
    APIDOLOGIE, 2013, 44 (06) : 621 - 629
  • [27] Antibacterial activity of essential oils from Cymbopogon: Inter- and intra-specific differences
    Pattnaik, S
    Subramanyam, VR
    Kole, CR
    Sahoo, S
    MICROBIOS, 1995, 84 (341) : 239 - 245
  • [28] Inter- and intra-specific patterns of density dependence and population size variability in Salmoniformes
    Dochtermann, Ned A.
    Peacock, Mary M.
    OECOLOGIA, 2013, 171 (01) : 153 - 162
  • [29] Inter- and intra-specific responses to elevated ozone and chamber climate in northern birches
    Manninen, S.
    Huttunen, S.
    Vanhatalo, M.
    Pakonen, T.
    Hamalainen, A.
    ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION, 2009, 157 (05) : 1679 - 1688
  • [30] Honey bees and bumble bees respond differently to inter- and intra-specific encounters
    Shelley R. Rogers
    Peter Cajamarca
    David R. Tarpy
    Hannah J. Burrack
    Apidologie, 2013, 44 : 621 - 629