Willingness to pay and political support for a US national clean energy standard

被引:0
作者
Aldy J.E. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Kotchen M.J. [2 ,4 ]
Leiserowitz A.A. [4 ]
机构
[1] Harvard University, Cambridge
[2] National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge
[3] Resources for the Future, Washington
[4] Yale University, New Haven
关键词
D O I
10.1038/nclimate1527
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In 2010 and 2011, Republicans and Democrats proposed mandating clean power generation in the electricity sector. To evaluate public support for a national clean energy standard (NCES), we conducted a nationally representative survey that included randomized treatments on the sources of eligible power generation and programme costs. We find that the average US citizen is willing to pay US$162 per year in higher electricity bills (95% confidence interval: US$128ĝ€"260), representing a 13% increase, in support of a NCES that requires 80% clean energy by 2035. Support for a NCES is lower among non-whites, older individuals and Republicans. We also employ our statistical model, along with census data for each state and Congressional district, to simulate voting behaviour on a NCES by Members of Congress assuming they vote consistently with the preferences of their median voter. We estimate that Senate passage of a NCES would require an average household cost below US$59 per year, and House passage would require costs below US$48 per year. The results imply that an ĝ€ 80% by 2035ĝ NCES could pass both chambers of Congress if it increases electricity rates less than 5% on average. © 2012 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:596 / 599
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Willingness to Pay for Renewable Energy in Myanmar: Energy Source Preference
    Numata, Masako
    Sugiyama, Masahiro
    Swe, Wunna
    del Barrio Alvarez, Daniel
    ENERGIES, 2021, 14 (05)
  • [22] Store brand vs. national brand prices: Willingness to pay ≠ willingness to accept
    Boyle, Peter J.
    Lathrop, E. Scott
    Kim, Hyoshin
    JOURNAL OF GLOBAL SCHOLARS OF MARKETING SCIENCE, 2021, 31 (04) : 563 - 579
  • [23] WILLINGNESS TO PAY FOR HEALTH CARE IN THE US: WHOSE PERSPECTIVE IS IT ANYWAY?
    Treadwell, S.
    Lu, C. Y.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2017, 20 (05) : A54 - A54
  • [24] Willingness to pay for what? Testing the impact of four factors on willingness to pay for facilitating and sanctioning energy policy instruments
    Kim, Sohee
    Kim, Seoyong
    ENERGY REPORTS, 2023, 10 : 285 - 299
  • [25] Willingness to pay for non-biotech foods in the US and UK
    Moon, W
    Balasubramanian, SK
    JOURNAL OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS, 2003, 37 (02) : 317 - 339
  • [26] Asymmetric dependency among US national financial conditions and clean energy markets
    Zeng, Hongjun
    Abedin, Mohammad Zoynul
    Wu, Ran
    Ahmed, Abdullahi D.
    GLOBAL FINANCE JOURNAL, 2024, 63
  • [27] Willingness to pay for a novel carbon label: A choice experiment in the US
    Lin, Wen
    Nayga, Rodolfo M.
    Yang, Wei
    ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2022, 114
  • [28] US Peach Producer Preference and Willingness to Pay for Fruit Attributes
    Zhao, Shuoli
    Yue, Chengyan
    Luby, James
    Gallardo, Karina
    McCracken, Vicki
    McFerson, James
    Layne, Desmond R.
    HORTSCIENCE, 2017, 52 (01) : 116 - 121
  • [29] Exploring the Spatial Heterogeneity of Residents' Marginal Willingness to Pay for Clean Air in Shanghai
    Lai, Ziliang
    Liu, Xinghua
    Li, Wenxiang
    Li, Ye
    Zou, Guojian
    Tu, Meiting
    FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 9