Prostate biopsy in the supine position in a standard 1.5-T scanner under real time MR-imaging control using a MR-compatible endorectal biopsy device

被引:0
作者
K. Engelhard
H. P. Hollenbach
B. Kiefer
A. Winkel
K. Goeb
D. Engehausen
机构
[1] Radiologische Abteilung,
[2] Krankenhaus Martha-Maria,undefined
[3] Siemens Medical Solutions,undefined
[4] Invivo Germany GmbH,undefined
[5] Urologische Klinik der Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg,undefined
来源
European Radiology | 2006年 / 16卷
关键词
Prostate; MRI; Biopsy;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Thirty-seven consecutive patients with elevated PSA levels and negative tumor prostate biopsies underwent a MR-guided prostate biopsy in a 1.5-T scanner in the supine position. After localization of suspected tumor areas using an endorectal coil and two body-phased array coils, the biopsy device was positioned without any repositioning of the patient. The biopsy device consisted of a mount, a ball joint, a positioning stage and an insertion stage with a needle guide, which was filled with a MR-visible fluid to control positioning of the needle using a balanced steady-state free precession sequence (TrueFISP) and a high-resolution turbo spin echo (T2-TSE) sequence. Core biopsies were taken manually in the magnet. The biopsy needle could be correctly positioned in all cases. Suspected lesions with a diameter ≥10 mm could be successfully punctured. Four to nine (mean =6) biopsies were taken per patient. In 14 patients, prostate cancer was confirmed at histology. Twenty-four biopsies positive for cancer were performed in 14 patients. A correct correlation was found between the site of biopsy and histology. MR-guided prostate biopsy can be effective in increasing primary positive tumor biopsy results in patients with a history of negative tumor TRUS-guided prostate biopsies.
引用
收藏
页码:1237 / 1243
页数:6
相关论文
共 136 条
  • [1] Dennis LK(2000)Analysis of recent trends in prostate cancer incidence and mortality Prostate 42 247-252
  • [2] Resnick MI(2005)MR imaging-guided prostate biopsy with a closed MR unit at 1.5 T: Initial results Radiology 234 576-581
  • [3] Beyersdorff D(2000)Sextant localization of prostate cancer: comparison of sextant biopsy magnetic Resonance imaging and magnetized resonance spectroscopic imaging with step section histology J Urol 164 400-404
  • [4] Winkel A(1998)Magnetic resonance imaging of clinically localized prostate cancer J Urol 159 915-919
  • [5] Hamm B(2002)Patients with a history of elevated prostate-specific antigen levels and negative transrectal US-guided quadrant or sextant biopsy results: value of MR imaging Radiology 224 701-706
  • [6] Lenk S(1998)Endorectal coil magnetic resonance imaging identifies locally advanced prostate cancer in select patients with clinically localized disease Urology 51 449-454
  • [7] Loening StA(2001)The value of endorectal MR imaging to predict positive biopsies in clinically intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients Eur Radiol 11 229-235
  • [8] Taupitz M(2002)Characterization of low-intensity lesions in the peripheral zone of prostate on pre-biopsy endorectal coil MR imaging Eur Radiol 12 357-365
  • [9] Wefer AE(1999)Prospective evaluation of endorectal magnetic resonance imaging to detect tumor foci in men with prior negative prostatic biopsy: a pilot study J Urol 162 1314-1317
  • [10] Hricak H(2003)The value of endorectal MRI in the early diagnosis of prostate cancer Eur Urol 44 201-208